Started By
Message
re: Anybody else read Beards arrest Affadavit?
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:40 pm to Grateful Reb
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:40 pm to Grateful Reb
quote:You misquoted it , shitbag. i said "i bet".
Grateful Reb
0
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:41 pm to JayAg
Uh, I was just laughing at poor grammar.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:41 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
Finally, assault in Texas is defined as purposefully or knowingly causing physical contact with another person when the defendant knows that the other person would consider the contact to be offensive or provocative. Again, the other person in the case can be the charged individual's spouse.
Yep.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:43 pm to VolNavy98
Pretty much we were told there is a difference between talking shite/threats vs putting hands/physically touching. He committed assault and battery. He can cry all day she assaulted him first. That’s irrelevant to his crime. They are asking him if he choked her, he is answering why he choked her.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:44 pm to JayAg
quote:
He can cry all day she assaulted him first. That’s irrelevant to his crime. They are asking him if he choked her, he is answering why he choked her.
Nobody here has said he’s innocent because she assaulted him first. Nobody.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:45 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
when the defendant knows that the other person would consider the contact to be offensive or provocative.
Do you understand this part? She was no longer a threat when she left the room and she was attacked in the bedroom 10-15 minutes later. It would be one thing if he would have reacted right then. But he did not. The situation was resolved and he became the aggressor 10-15 minutes later. He can’t claim she was the aggressor anymore once she had removed her selves from the original situation. She also tried to
Reconcile by giving him more glasses. At this point she was no longer a threat. And he lost his temper and beat the shite out of her.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:46 pm to AHM21
What a bitch.
She assaulted him and then when he was enraged she called the cops. They should both go to jail. He should have walk away and just called the cops. She would not have been arrested but the incident would have been documented.
They both have issues and should go to jail for this but he obviously went way over the top he is screwed and he will be crucified unless he can produce the tapes that will also probably incriminate him and probably only prove that she started a physical fight and probably escalated it physically way more then she would ever admit. But he will go down for this he is a male and she is a female. Should never be around or hang with a woman like that your only one with anything to lose.
She assaulted him and then when he was enraged she called the cops. They should both go to jail. He should have walk away and just called the cops. She would not have been arrested but the incident would have been documented.
They both have issues and should go to jail for this but he obviously went way over the top he is screwed and he will be crucified unless he can produce the tapes that will also probably incriminate him and probably only prove that she started a physical fight and probably escalated it physically way more then she would ever admit. But he will go down for this he is a male and she is a female. Should never be around or hang with a woman like that your only one with anything to lose.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:48 pm to VolNavy98
I have no idea how you breathe without assistance.
Per the law you just copied and pasted, she assaulted him when she forcibly took his glasses out of his hands and broke them.
They both committed a crime.
He had removed himself from the situation for two days before she came into his spare bedroom and assaulted him.
Per the law you just copied and pasted, she assaulted him when she forcibly took his glasses out of his hands and broke them.
They both committed a crime.
quote:
He can’t claim she was the aggressor anymore once she had removed her selves from the original situation.
He had removed himself from the situation for two days before she came into his spare bedroom and assaulted him.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:48 pm to Lsutigerturner
He was fired right
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:50 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
He had removed himself from the situation for two days before she came into his spare bedroom and assaulted him.
Does not matter what happened 2 days prior, it’s totally irrelevant. Only thing that is relevant is he didn’t call the law when she was the “aggressor”. He then became the aggressor in a separate incident that happened 15 minutes later.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:53 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
Only thing that is relevant is he didn’t call the law when she was the “aggressor”. He then became the aggressor in a separate incident that happened 15 minutes later.
Great. So we’re in agreement that they’re both criminals and he should have had her arrested for being a domestic abuser.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:56 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
So we’re in agreement that they’re both criminals
Hell no. She never caused bodily harm or threatened to cause bodily harm. She took his glasses out of his hands. She was never a physical threat to him nor did she threaten him. It is never ok for a man to hit a woman, under no circumstances unless your in fear of your life.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:59 pm to TutHillTiger
Suspended it looks like firing soon to come I imagine looking for with cause so lawyers need to get paperwork right prior
Posted on 12/12/22 at 11:01 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
She never caused bodily harm or threatened to cause bodily harm.
That’s not the full definition of assault in Texas. It has 3 parts. You posted it yourself. She initiated physical contact by forcibly taking his glasses out of his hands and breaking them, in an act that she had no doubt would be provocative. That is assault, per the definition you posted.
quote:
intentionally or knowingly causes physical contact with another when the person knows or should reasonably believe that the other will regard the contact as offensive or provocative.
quote:
It is never ok for a man to hit a woman, under no circumstances unless your in fear of your life.
Irrelevant. Nobody is calling him innocent. I’m calling him a retard for not dumping the psycho years ago and for allowing the psycho domestic abuser around his children.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 11:02 pm to Slackaveli
quote:
I actually have lol.
I thought he'd get out of this til i heard the biting.
She pushed the wrong button with the reading glasses thing and he just said "frick it".
She does mention that he just all of a sudden stopped. The Baw realized what was happening too late.
This is what it seems like to me.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 11:05 pm to Tuscaloosa
Women are overrated. They don’t even have balls.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 11:07 pm to Monahans
Why do all the horn coaching issues involve biting?
Posted on 12/12/22 at 11:09 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
She initiated physical contact by forcibly taking his glasses out of his hands and breaking them, in an act that she had no doubt would be provocative. That is assault, per the definition you posted.
Even if you consider this a “misdemeanor crime” that even was over with when they separated. No harm no foul. He wasn’t hurt, or attacked or felt threatened at that time. Or at least enough to defend himself. He then comes to bed and beats her arse 15 minutes later. End of story!! He’s taking the ride and the state will make sure of it.
Posted on 12/12/22 at 11:10 pm to VolNavy98
quote:
No harm no foul.
That’s not how crimes work. She assaulted him.
Why are you defending her?
Posted on 12/12/22 at 11:14 pm to SmackoverHawg
quote:
Easier said than done! Even when you know better. They just seem, and are, so damn fun until the wheels fly off.
100% truth. The hot-crazy matrix is accurate AF.
Page 8 of 12
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News