Started By
Message
re: Alabama’s first half of the season is basically preseason
Posted on 8/9/19 at 9:38 am to CivilTiger83
Posted on 8/9/19 at 9:38 am to CivilTiger83
It's funny how Clemson fans seems to forget that they got stomped by Alabama the year before last and Alabama won the title (sound familiar?). They're 2-2 and they act like they've won 10 titles all of a sudden.
As long as Clemson has a top 2 QB in the country they'll be in the title game. If they don't (like the Kelly Bryant year), they'll get pounded by Alabama no matter who is playing QB for Alabama.
As long as Clemson has a top 2 QB in the country they'll be in the title game. If they don't (like the Kelly Bryant year), they'll get pounded by Alabama no matter who is playing QB for Alabama.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 10:38 am to OldPete
“They are physical games despite the score”
I laughed....
I laughed....
Posted on 8/9/19 at 10:43 am to DannyByGodFord
Dude, I'm a Louisville fan. Our conference is terrible and Clemson has the easiest path to the cfbp every single season. You barely beat A&M last season now imagine playing 3 or 4 more of those games, and sometimes in a row. Clemson fans are weird as shite, and we all call them the retarded step brothers of the ACC. Yall see why now
Posted on 8/9/19 at 10:49 am to Inthecards
Well we did play two more SEC teams after A&M....
We went 2-0 and scored 100 points.
We went 2-0 and scored 100 points.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 10:51 am to DannyByGodFord
We all know who yall played. That's not the same as playing an entire SEC schedule tater. Dumb af
Posted on 8/9/19 at 12:08 pm to DannyByGodFord
quote:
I laughed....
Laugh all you want...but Mississippi State had just as many first round draft picks on their defense this past season as Clemson did. Auburn's DL was a top unit last season and LSU always has a strong D. All of these defenses played physical games against us; it's not these teams' defenses fault that their offense struggled against us...
If you'd finished reading my post, you would've noticed that I didn't blame Bama's loss on our schedule ; while our late-season schedule was a grind, we had a month to refresh and prep. Clemson won because they were the better team...
Posted on 8/9/19 at 12:27 pm to OldPete
The notion that all P5 football games are not physical is laughable.
ACC teams have been holding their own against the SEC for about a decade now.
You point to recruiting ranking and draft picks to prove that the SEC is so much stronger, but what gets ignored are the actual results on the field.
ACC teams have been holding their own against the SEC for about a decade now.
You point to recruiting ranking and draft picks to prove that the SEC is so much stronger, but what gets ignored are the actual results on the field.
Posted on 8/9/19 at 12:28 pm to Inthecards
If the team we beat 44-16 can coast through an SEC schedule I think we can....
Posted on 8/9/19 at 1:01 pm to DannyByGodFord
quote:
Please stop talking about how brutal your schedule is.
Ummm. . . where exactly did anyone from Bama call that schedule 'brutal'?
Posted on 8/9/19 at 3:04 pm to DannyByGodFord
quote:
The notion that all P5 football games are not physical is laughable.
So you think playing Oregon State would be just as physical as playing Michigan? They're both P5 schools...
Posted on 8/9/19 at 5:27 pm to Inthecards
Lol. Louisville was begging to be in the ACC. You were a good addition until the wheels fell off. Its not our fault you don't add to the strength of schedule.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News