Started By
Message
re: Alabama is not an elite football school by todays standards.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:08 pm to TowandaTiger
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:08 pm to TowandaTiger
ffs is OP serious?
0
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:10 pm to Hook Em Horns
At the end of most years there is still a debate about what woulda happened if this team got in instead of another.
UGA would have easily beaten LSU in 07. They had the same record and appeared to be the better team.
In 08 UT could claim the championship just as much as UF they both beat OU about the same and ended with the same record etc.
undefeated seasons, confrence championships etc are not judged by pollsters or computers.
UGA would have easily beaten LSU in 07. They had the same record and appeared to be the better team.
In 08 UT could claim the championship just as much as UF they both beat OU about the same and ended with the same record etc.
undefeated seasons, confrence championships etc are not judged by pollsters or computers.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:13 pm to BhamDore
quote:
UGA would have easily beaten LSU in 07. They had the same record and appeared to be the better team.
Except that UGA team couldn't even beat that "weakass" Tennessee team to win their division.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:19 pm to TowandaTiger
Yall are arguing about one of the most inherently subjective topics possible, comparing teams cross eras over 30+ years to determine their current overall "place" in CFB.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:19 pm to wadewilson
Except they did beat weak arse Kentucky, who beat LSU.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:22 pm to TowandaTiger
so, let's say that boise st., with their weak-arse schedule, lucks into a couple of bsc national championship games in the next 10 or so years and wins--they would be considered an elite program?
2 championships do not make elite--they make you really good for a few years...you need a little history to back up the elite status..
2 championships do not make elite--they make you really good for a few years...you need a little history to back up the elite status..
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:23 pm to RMFTBama
exactly you didn't exactly blow Tenn out either and there was this little overtime game with UK that you didn't come out with a W.
It was still a great season for LSU 12 wins and a SEC title is a great season, but it wasn't undefeated.
AU in 04 didn't win the BCS, but there season was more accomplished and impressive than LSU 07 and 03.
It was still a great season for LSU 12 wins and a SEC title is a great season, but it wasn't undefeated.
AU in 04 didn't win the BCS, but there season was more accomplished and impressive than LSU 07 and 03.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:25 pm to RMFTBama
Take away the Navy and the British Empire would have been a small island nation.
Take Rome away from the Roman Empire and what do you have? NOTHING.
FSU and PSU are complete shite if you take away Bowden/Paterno.
Take Rome away from the Roman Empire and what do you have? NOTHING.
FSU and PSU are complete shite if you take away Bowden/Paterno.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:26 pm to BhamDore
quote:
UGA would have easily beaten LSU in 07. They had the same record and appeared to be the better team.
First, they didn't have the same record. And 11-2 with an SEC Championship >>> 10-2 with no SEC Championships. Second, your opinion of who was better means shite. I heard the same thing about UGA going into the SECCG in 2003 and UGA got their asses handed to them by LSU. In 2007, LSU won the division and won the conference. UGA didn't win it's own division. You don't get a shot at the title if you can't win your own division.
Bottom line is there is no debate, no matter how hard you try. 2003 was disputed. 2007 was not.
This post was edited on 11/3/10 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:27 pm to bingo
quote:
lucks into a couple of bsc national championship games
so by Boise winning 2 NCs they are immediately on par with LSU, thats the argument here?
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:51 pm to WelcomeToDeathValley
just using a hypothetical that directly relates to the op's statement....
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:57 pm to bingo
This thread has an extra chromosome.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:58 pm to TowandaTiger
This may be one of the worst flame threads I have read. I am not a fan of Alabama football but to say it is not elite is stupid.
- Bama had their own damn show on ESPN
- Their facilities are among the best
- BDS makes Tiger Stadium look like a shite hole.
- Bama had a perfect season, heisman trophy winner and national championship in the same season.
I could go on but I know that there have been enough people to tell you that you are dumb by now.
- Bama had their own damn show on ESPN
- Their facilities are among the best
- BDS makes Tiger Stadium look like a shite hole.
- Bama had a perfect season, heisman trophy winner and national championship in the same season.
I could go on but I know that there have been enough people to tell you that you are dumb by now.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:58 pm to bingo
quote:
just using a hypothetical that directly relates to the op's statement....
doesnt answer the question
quote:
you need a little history to back up the elite status.
So Yale is considered elite?
This post was edited on 11/3/10 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 11/3/10 at 6:59 pm to mla0003
quote:
This thread has an extra chromosome.
clever
Posted on 11/3/10 at 7:01 pm to Marines4Auburn
Marines...where have you been?
Posted on 11/3/10 at 7:02 pm to TowandaTiger
i'm all for hammering Gumps but maybe leaving Bear Bryant out of it would be best.
Posted on 11/3/10 at 7:02 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
Marines...where have you been?
My brother had his first child, named it after me. I also made a trip to Dallas to be with a bunch of girls and catch the World Series.
How you been?
Posted on 11/3/10 at 7:03 pm to TowandaTiger
quote:
TowandaTiger
Total IDIOT. Bama is a top three program all-time.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News