Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:12 am to spslayto
quote:
So you jump off the bridge schedule argument when you see how unbalanced it's been.
I didnt jump off anything. I am saying using two years for your argument is highly skewed considering the amount of teams and the time it take to rotate. You are blinded by your homerism and hatred of Bama
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:13 am to spslayto
quote:
What?
Response to him from his pic
This post was edited on 4/11/13 at 9:14 am
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:17 am to NYCAuburn
I heart NYCAuburn. 
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:31 am to suleimon
quote:
I heart NYCAuburn
He's the strangest Auburn fan I've ever seen.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:35 am to rtr14
I have grown tired of this false argument since the 2012 schedules were released.
Dont worry I hate yall still
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:40 am to NYCAuburn
The beautiful thing about championship games is that they take the air right out of this argument.
Yes, the schedules were and are unbalanced. Yes, at this particular time, Alabama has benefitted. But if you didn't deserve to be in the game, it makes it rather moot when you actually win it. Same thing for the BCS title game. Regardless of who had the easier road, when you line up and win the championship game, you've pretty much proven yourself.
The rest is just wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Yes, the schedules were and are unbalanced. Yes, at this particular time, Alabama has benefitted. But if you didn't deserve to be in the game, it makes it rather moot when you actually win it. Same thing for the BCS title game. Regardless of who had the easier road, when you line up and win the championship game, you've pretty much proven yourself.
The rest is just wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:41 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Which team LSU or Bama played teams from the east with more wins combined?
Well, Bama played Vandy (2-6) Tenn and UF.
LSU played Kentucky (2-6) Tenn and UF.
But Kentucky is historically a better program than Vanderbilt. That's how this works, isn't it?
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:44 am to wadewilson
is Vt going to be good enough to even give bama a game
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:45 am to wadewilson
quote:
wadewilson
LOL, nice try
But since you didnt answer my question, in both 2010 and 2011 LSU played an easier East division schedule
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:46 am to Crimson Legend
quote:
The beautiful thing about championship games is that they take the air right out of this argument.
It really doesn't though. The two teams in the SEC championship last year played cross divisional opponents of Missouri, Tennessee, Ole Miss, and Auburn. Yeah, so they played each other at the end of the season. But would they have even been there if they had to play top competition from the opposite division?
The only real way to fix the schedules is to expand to 16 and play in a sort of pod system, with 4 mini-divisions.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:47 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
in both 2010 and 2011 LSU played an easier East division schedule
I literally just explained to you how they didn't play an easier schedule in 2011.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:48 am to wadewilson
quote:
I literally just explained to you how they didn't play an easier schedule in 2011.
LSU east opponents had 1 more loss than Bama. if you are going to use historical value of the program as your argument, then Bama's is much harder considering UT>UF
And after looking it up, historicaly Vandy>UK football because of the conference championship tiebreaker
This post was edited on 4/11/13 at 9:52 am
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:58 am to NYCAuburn
Kentucky and Vanderbilt had the same SEC record.
If you're including overall schedules, then there's no contest. LSU's schedule was way stronger than Bama's.
If you're including overall schedules, then there's no contest. LSU's schedule was way stronger than Bama's.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:59 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
And after looking it up, historicaly Vandy>UK football because of the conference championship tiebreaker
Kentucky also has a national title and a couple SEC ones, and a .499 win percentage to Vandy's .498, SO PUT THAT IN YOUR PIPE AND SMOKE IT.
Sorry for shouting.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 9:59 am to wadewilson
quote:
If you're including overall schedules, then there's no contest. LSU's schedule was way stronger than Bama's.
Isnt the debate about cross divisional games? I believe so. So LSU's overall schedule doesnt matter one bit
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:03 am to crimsonsaint
quote:
Ole Miss, Arkansas, Tennessee, LSU, Mississippi State, and Auburn
Saban made them all quit.
Not our fault they all (except LSU) suck.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:03 am to wadewilson
quote:
Kentucky also has a national title and a couple SEC ones
So do you think Bama has 15 national Championships and if you do and are going to claim UK's as well, then Vandy still > UK with 2 NC's
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:04 am to NYCAuburn
It's odd that I've never seen Tenn fans complain about having to play Alabama every year, especially with them as down as they are, and Bama winning as many Championships as they are winning.
I've never seen a Florida fan complain about having to play Lsu either.
I've never seen a Florida fan complain about having to play Lsu either.
Posted on 4/11/13 at 10:06 am to hubertcumberdale
If you need someone to vent to, I'm here. I'd be going crazy if Nick Saban left my school only to return to another school and perform even better.
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News