Started By
Message

re: Aggies, why tu?

Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:05 pm to
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29286 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

So you are telling me that Texas isn't best public school in the state?


Their med school and their law school are.

Petroleum engineering(which was my major) was most certainly not.
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7350 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

So you are telling me that Texas isn't best public school in the state?

When talking about the "best" mega public school in the state, it's all relative.

If you want to be an accountant or historian, go to Texas.

If you want to be an engineer or be among the most highly recruited graduates in the country, go to A&M.
This post was edited on 12/27/12 at 8:07 pm
Posted by townestoldme2
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2012
499 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:09 pm to
their business school is better than ours

who really gives a frick?
Posted by Sig
dallas
Member since Oct 2010
2042 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:11 pm to
better is relative.. both are top 20 and fine schools for anyone to go to. We were still the first big state university.

frick them doodz
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:18 pm to
In terms of who earns more after college, A&M is far and away a better University.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8796 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

Maybe you should read the Goddamn Texas Constitution which says this. I know not all of your frickers are as dumb as our fricking Aggie governor.

quote:
SEC. 10. The Legislature shall, as soon as practicable, establish, organize and provide for the maintenance, support and direction of a university of the first class, to be located by a vote of the people of this State, and styled "The University of Texas," for the promotion of literature, and the arts and sciences, including an agricultural and mechanical department.


quote:
SEC. 13. The Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas, established by an act of the Legislature, passed April 17, 1871, located in the county of Brazos, is hereby made, and constituted a branch of the University of Texas, for instruction in agriculture, the mechanic arts and the natural sciences connected therewith. And the Legislature shall, at its next session, make an appropriation, not to exceed forty thousand dollars, for the construction and completion of the buildings and improvements, and for providing the furniture necessary to put said college in immediate and successful operation.


By the way, this was written in 1876. A&M is indeed an older institution, but the writers of the Constitution did not recognize it as anything other than an Ag school - and that is at the heart of the issue.


You are an idiot.

Maybe you should read the US Constitution. It has a clause for counting slaves as 3/5ths of a person. In both cases though the Constitution was changed. In the case of A&M and Texas it never actually even went into effect. A&M was never a branch of Texas because once Texas actually became a school it was decided that A&M and Texas should both be separate Flagship Universities.

Texas is a fine school as is A&M. It's really a matter of how you evaluate schools. A&M is larger than Texas, though just barely. The entrance requirements are very similar and very few people able to be accepted into one could not be accepted at the other. Both are AAU schools. Texas emphasizes different specialties than A&M does. A&M is a significantly better research school. A&M grads make more money after graduation.

Texas is only vastly superior to A&M in their arrogance and ego.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
59954 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

Can't handle being lil' bro which is why they have long adopted the pseudonym Texas Aggies. Texas seems to be a name they want so badly but won't admit why.




You really do enjoy looking like a dumbass dont you?
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

Maybe you should read the US Constitution. It has a clause for counting slaves as 3/5ths of a person. In both cases though the Constitution was changed. In the case of A&M and Texas it never actually even went into effect. A&M was never a branch of Texas because once Texas actually became a school it was decided that A&M and Texas should both be separate Flagship Universities. Texas is a fine school as is A&M. It's really a matter of how you evaluate schools. A&M is larger than Texas, though just barely. The entrance requirements are very similar and very few people able to be accepted into one could not be accepted at the other. Both are AAU schools. Texas emphasizes different specialties than A&M does. A&M is a significantly better research school. A&M grads make more money after graduation. Texas is only vastly superior to A&M in their arrogance and ego.


Got to it before me.

Posted by r'dx
Texas
Member since Mar 2012
251 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:55 pm to
Too much logic. Piggies and swamp cats must be dumbfounded.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
62995 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 12:04 am to
quote:

You had Kansas University and Kansas Aggies
Oklahoma University and Oklahoma Aggies
Texas University and Texas Aggies

This is the reason why The University of Oklahoma and The University of Kansas are OU and KU.


Okay, that's a decent explanation.

I did not know that K-State used to be the Aggies but I did know that Okie State used to be the Aggies.



So was Oklahoma STATE or Oklahoma the aggies? I are confuzzled. Okie St. makes more sense.

Just looked. Okie STATE was the Aggies and they are OSU. OU is not the same as OSU. OU has never been the aggies.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
62995 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 12:06 am to
quote:

In terms of who earns more after college, A&M is far and away a better University.



You dumb.

There are a million reasons why you might think this, but its clearly not an objective statement.
This post was edited on 12/28/12 at 12:08 am
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 12:06 am to
quote:

So was Oklahoma STATE or Oklahoma the aggies? I are confuzzled. Okie St. makes more sense. Just looked. Okie STATE was the Aggies and they are OSU. OU is not the same as OSU. OU has never been the aggies.


You're right. You are "confuzzled"

Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
62995 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 12:08 am to
quote:

You're right. You are "confuzzled"


I just love making up words.
Posted by bdelarosa7
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2012
1661 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 12:16 am to
quote:

I just love making up words.


It was ok I guess.

This might help with your objective argument.

Posted by CavalryAg07
ChiTown
Member since Jul 2009
2784 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 12:23 am to
quote:

You had Kansas University and Kansas Aggies Oklahoma University and Oklahoma Aggies Texas University and Texas Aggies

This is the reason why The University of Oklahoma and The University of Kansas are OU and KU.


well that's false.

all the original Big8 school had that unique moniker.

OU, CU, OSU, NU, ISU, KU, KSU, MU.
This post was edited on 12/28/12 at 12:29 am
Posted by OilfieldTrashAg
Austin, TX
Member since Aug 2011
1892 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 12:56 am to
frick em

They are the past
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5910 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:57 am to
Just to throw in another theory. I've also heard that Texas grads just called their school "the university". It was a jab because A&M was just a college (became a University in the 60's). So we called them tu for "the university" to make fun of their arrogance.
Posted by Bubbles Up
Member since Jul 2011
2910 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:25 am to
Oklahoma State was once Oklahoma A&M. Same with KSU and MSU. They were once the Oklahoma Aggies, Kansas Aggies, and Mississippi Aggies. We kept our name and mascot. We are the Texas Aggies of Texas A&M, not the Texas A&M Aggies as we are incorrectly referred to.

A&M and tu are "constitutionally" the same school, and we still are on funding day. They get 2/3 of the PUF, we get 1/3. Their system is larger than ours to reflect this. That's about where it stops with our "legal" connection to them.

As for calling them tu and tea sippers? We do that on tigerdroppings only to piss off the posters with SMU, Baylor, or Arkansas icons next to their handle.
Posted by SLC
Hiwasse, AR
Member since Oct 2007
15522 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Aggies, why tu?


I understand the t'cips was something to do with WW2 but what's the story behind tu?


Because if ut is really tu shouldn't y'all be tuatm?


Everyone should share aTm's hatred for Tejas.
Posted by SLC
Hiwasse, AR
Member since Oct 2007
15522 posts
Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:40 am to
quote:

frick em

They are the past


They have always been and always will be insufferable, delusional narcissists.

aTm's life and future is so much brighter now that they are no longer chained to them.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter