Started By
Message
re: Aggies make locker room code 50-7
Posted on 12/25/19 at 2:48 pm to NoCult
Posted on 12/25/19 at 2:48 pm to NoCult
quote:
So if TexasHorn is right, A&M is not even an independent school. They live off PUF managed and controlled by UT. A&M is basically a satellite campus for UT.
But he is not . . . .Texas A&M became its own separate system in 1948. It has its own separate trustees, legislative appropriations, etc etc. Ditto for the other systems in the state including Texas Tech and UofH.
The PUF stuff is largely an archaic book-keeping and back-office convention from the late 1800s. The Texas system has no control over how much is given out to other institutions. It is told what to do by the legislature which in turn has to get voter sign off for any changes.
Right now there is a big political discussion of stripping both A&M and Texas's allocation and re-allocating portions to other systems around the state. If the legislator decides that is ok, there is nothing A&M or UT can do about it and that just underscores how blitheringly idiotic any notion of the funds belonging to the Texas system or being "given away". The PUF is a wholly separate endowment that currently pays out to a select group of beneficiaries. The UT system is just a convenient parking place for state assets given its pretty old role as the accounting office.
Interestingly, the endowment was put together before the University of Texas or A&M were even envisioned by Texas citizens. It was put forth by the Republic of Texas prior to Texas becoming part of the United States. A&M didn't start operating until 1871 . . .almost 40 years later. Texas did not start for another decade or almost a half century later.
Both University Systems are lucky that the low-rent West Texas grazing lands gifted to the endowment turned out to be lucrative sources of mineral income. Both systems have been lucky to split the funds just themselves.
I am guessing in the near future the current dialogue regarding public education will at a minimum strip the UT of its extra 1/3rd and it will probably be cut up by the voters to a greater extent over the next 50 years.
But hey, if you want to pretend that blind mineral luck and some far-sighted politicians from a half century before UT even existed mean there is some secret Longhorn brilliance that A&M should pray they never lose access to, go ahead and kid yourself.
This post was edited on 12/25/19 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 12/25/19 at 2:59 pm to Windy City
Wait a minute. That wall of text, that posting style...is Windy City the poster formerly known as Aggressor?
Incidentally, there's no point in engaging with texashorn, an individual that claims that military service is neither honorable nor heroic if you take a commission through ROTC.
Incidentally, there's no point in engaging with texashorn, an individual that claims that military service is neither honorable nor heroic if you take a commission through ROTC.
This post was edited on 12/25/19 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 12/25/19 at 4:09 pm to Dr RC
Well, I am not sure whom to believe here. I would like Randy Duke and Old Sarge to duel this out. This needs to be put to rest. Either A&M is UT's little sister or not?
Posted on 12/25/19 at 4:25 pm to NoCult
The state constitution, which has not been amended in this regard, makes aggy a branch of The University of Texas. This is quite clear.
Any subsequent law or policy that has any effect otherwise is completely unconstitutional and is on its face null and void.
Randy needs to take this to the Texas Supreme Court.
The same state constitution confers title to the oil land to The University of Texas. This also remains in effect. The only changes to the constitution have been how the PROCEEDS of land sale or mineral extraction are to be split. Windy City (and how) doesn’t grasp that distinction.
Aggy didn’t give one whit about the land until oil was discovered, then they whined and stuck out their hand (sound familiar? Aggy is always looking for a handout).
Now let’s see “conservative” aggys who believe in constitutional supremacy, argue that.
Any subsequent law or policy that has any effect otherwise is completely unconstitutional and is on its face null and void.
Randy needs to take this to the Texas Supreme Court.
The same state constitution confers title to the oil land to The University of Texas. This also remains in effect. The only changes to the constitution have been how the PROCEEDS of land sale or mineral extraction are to be split. Windy City (and how) doesn’t grasp that distinction.
Aggy didn’t give one whit about the land until oil was discovered, then they whined and stuck out their hand (sound familiar? Aggy is always looking for a handout).
Now let’s see “conservative” aggys who believe in constitutional supremacy, argue that.
Posted on 12/25/19 at 6:20 pm to texashorn
Sounds like you know what you are talking about Horn. Thanks for clearing this up for everyone else.
FINALLY
FINALLY
Posted on 12/26/19 at 10:59 am to The Good Ship Venus
I really didn’t know about all this history and how UT owns mineral rights in W Texas.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 12:00 pm to Errerrerrwere
So Aggies are really not as rich as they say? They sorta duped SEC saying they got all that money, which was basically a handout from UT. Obviously now they are high on SEC hog. They are sorta like Johnny Manziel, old car dealership rich.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 12:07 pm to NoCult
surprised mods havent noticed you yet. maybe they have now though. lutz
Posted on 12/26/19 at 12:13 pm to NoCult
I wouldn’t say “Aggies are rich” (many certainly are); but the university is fiscally fortunate.
I won’t play the UTex game/tale as old as time
.
As for the Manziel family ... they’re (Paul and Michelle Manziel—Johnny’s parents) oil tycoons and businesspeople, worth tens of millions.
I won’t play the UTex game/tale as old as time

As for the Manziel family ... they’re (Paul and Michelle Manziel—Johnny’s parents) oil tycoons and businesspeople, worth tens of millions.
This post was edited on 12/26/19 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 12/26/19 at 12:44 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
The score’s the code to get in our locker rooms and our building."
BRB, going to get some aTm swag

Posted on 12/26/19 at 1:27 pm to Mr Sausage
quote:
ook at this idiot circle jerk. All the mouth breathers come together at Christmas.
The truth about aggy really eats you alive doesn’t it? You are in every thread crying like a little school girl.

Posted on 12/26/19 at 3:03 pm to Statestreet
And I can sing all the songs about Texas...
And I can do all the sad ones; that I know...
I can’t help it; I look like Merle Haggard...
And I sound a lot like like David Allen Coe!
Posted on 12/26/19 at 3:39 pm to texashorn
The original drafters of The Texas Constitution and it's high level of detail meant that the Constitution could easily become outdated and would need to be changed to keep up with society. They therefore made it easy to amend, and it has been amended nearly 500 times, more than only 3 other states.
These two factors - the length and the ease of amendment - mean that in Texas, the Constitution functions more as an adjunct to the statutes than a static set of governing principles. It is a dynamic, living document and was designed to be changed to reflect the growth and development of the state.
The hilarity that you and the satterfield shitheads embrace this topic is dumbfounding.
These two factors - the length and the ease of amendment - mean that in Texas, the Constitution functions more as an adjunct to the statutes than a static set of governing principles. It is a dynamic, living document and was designed to be changed to reflect the growth and development of the state.
The hilarity that you and the satterfield shitheads embrace this topic is dumbfounding.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 6:45 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Why did they publicly state their locker room code?
Doesn’t matter. They always keep the back door open.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 7:07 pm to drivebyag
quote:
The original drafters of The Texas Constitution and it's high level of detail meant that the Constitution could easily become outdated and would need to be changed to keep up with society. They therefore made it easy to amend, and it has been amended nearly 500 times, more than only 3 other states. These two factors - the length and the ease of amendment - mean that in Texas, the Constitution functions more as an adjunct to the statutes than a static set of governing principles. It is a dynamic, living document and was designed to be changed to reflect the growth and development of the state. The hilarity that you and the satterfield shitheads embrace this topic is dumbfounding.
The portions referenced haven’t been changed, aggy, so they still stand.

You need to work on your reading comprehension.
Late edit: To my knowledge, the A&M System and its Board of Regents was created by an act of the state legislature. If you can demonstrate that either were created by constitutional amendment, then I apologize (but I don’t think either were).
You are welcome to prove me wrong.
This post was edited on 12/26/19 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 12/26/19 at 8:45 pm to texashorn
Texhorn brings the info!
Thanks!
Thanks!
Posted on 12/26/19 at 9:19 pm to scott8811
quote:
We’re definitely going to keep that LSU taste in our mouth so we can come back hungry," Ausbon said

Popular
Back to top
