Started By
Message
A&M interception overturned vs Alabama
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:19 pm
Does any body have a link to this particular interception?
Every google or YouTube only shows the game winning interception. That or some 1 hour video by two losers on a podcast or something that I will not suffer through.
Every google or YouTube only shows the game winning interception. That or some 1 hour video by two losers on a podcast or something that I will not suffer through.
7
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:20 pm to Beau Tie
This post was edited on 2/16/13 at 11:55 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:20 pm to Beau Tie
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:20 pm to JDM1992
This post was edited on 2/16/13 at 11:54 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:21 pm to JDM1992
Nice car? 
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:21 pm to Beau Tie
This post was edited on 2/16/13 at 11:54 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:22 pm to JDM1992
That idiot from the help board?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:23 pm to TH03
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 12:05 am
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:24 pm to JDM1992
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:26 pm to Beau Tie
I DVRd the game. The guys toe was definitely in. Toe came down, foot continues coming down until heel hits over the line. Looked to me like he was clearly in bounds on the replay. Same thing we saw in the close up on the replay board in the stadium, toe was in.
I just happened to back it up and noticed that when our guy was coming down with the ball, the receiver tried to make a play on our guy. It actually looks like the ball might have moved slightly as our guy was coming down.
Never heard the "official" version of why it wasn't an interception. I now think it is possible the toe being in or out wasn't the issue... may not have caught the ball cleanly. Ball looks like it started to move.
They may have started the review based on looking at his feet but the ball movement was probably the deciding factor in not overturning it.
I just happened to back it up and noticed that when our guy was coming down with the ball, the receiver tried to make a play on our guy. It actually looks like the ball might have moved slightly as our guy was coming down.
Never heard the "official" version of why it wasn't an interception. I now think it is possible the toe being in or out wasn't the issue... may not have caught the ball cleanly. Ball looks like it started to move.
They may have started the review based on looking at his feet but the ball movement was probably the deciding factor in not overturning it.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 7:41 pm to Beau Tie
Of course you, an LSU fan, wants a video of this.
"The more for me to bitch about, my pretty"
"The more for me to bitch about, my pretty"
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:04 pm to Funky Tide 8
Gumpsessed corndog fan brings up a call in a game that had no influence on the outcome. Why am i not suprised?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:12 pm to Beau Tie
Clearly an INT .. They missed that call IMO
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:12 pm to Beau Tie
IAW This Incomplete
case book play # 37
Sorry IAW that it was not a catch therefore not an interception. The Good Guys won and that's all that matters!
case book play # 37
Sorry IAW that it was not a catch therefore not an interception. The Good Guys won and that's all that matters!
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:13 pm to Funky Tide 8
Actually I just wanted to see it because someone said it was like Patrick Petersons. That definitely wasn't like it. His foot was out of bounds.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:13 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Clearly an INT
Watch it again in slow motion... keep your eye on the ball itself, forget the feet.
Do you still feel it was clearly and interception?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:13 pm to Tridentds
quote:
Never heard the "official" version of why it wasn't an interception. I now think it is possible the toe being in or out wasn't the issue... may not have caught the ball cleanly. Ball looks like it started to move.
It's because, at least in college, if you fall backwards out of bounds you must get your toe AND heel in. However, if you drag your toe while falling, it is a completed pass. It was ruled correctly on the field and video evidence confirmed it.
And trust me.. if it was a busted call that went in the Tides favor (PP7 int..) I'd be all over that shite. Murray divot was my avatar for like a fricking year straight.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:14 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Clearly an INT .. They missed that call IMO
Contact your congressman.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:16 pm to bmy
quote:
It's because, at least in college, if you fall backwards out of bounds you must get your toe AND heel in. However, if you drag your toe while falling, it is a completed pass. It was ruled correctly on the field and video evidence confirmed it.
Nice explanation and correct.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 8:16 pm to crimsonsaint
I saw the same as above. Toe came down inbounds, heel out, but ball moved in his arms and may not have been considered in position when the toe hit.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News