Started By
Message

A rule change I think we can all agree upon
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:00 am
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:00 am
The NCAA Football Rules Committee proposed an alteration involving the instant-replay review on targeting fouls during its Feb. 11-12 meeting in Indianapolis, which includes the ejection of the player committing the foul along with a 15-yard penalty.
Last season, the targeting rule was implemented and any player committing the penalty would be ejected and his team assessed a 15-yard penalty.
The committee recommended that if the instant replay official rules that a disqualification should not have occurred, and if the targeting foul is not accompanied by another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for targeting should not be enforced.
However, if the targeting foul is committed in conjunction with another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for that personal foul remains. For example, if a player is called for roughing the passer and targeting the head and neck area, but the instant replay official rules that targeting did not occur, the player flagged would remain in the game, but the roughing the passer penalty would still be enforced.
All rules proposals must be approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which will discuss the football rules changes March 6. The proposed changes are being circulated for membership comment.
“Overall, the targeting rule was successful and has had the intended impact of making play safer,” said Troy Calhoun, head coach at the Air Force Academy and chair of the committee, which met Monday through Thursday in Indianapolis. “This alteration keeps the intent of the rule, but allows replay to correct all of the consequences from a rare missed call.”
In games where instant replay is not in use, the committee recommended an option to permit on-field officials to review targeting calls during halftime that were made during the first half. This is a permissive rule by conference policy or mutual consent of the teams and is the responsibility of the home team to provide the parameters for the use of video. The review must be conducted by the referee in the officials’ locker room.
Officials could then reverse the targeting call and allow the player to compete in the second half. The committee noted that many Football Championship Subdivision, Division II and Division III games are not played using instant replay so this modification gives those teams greater flexibility to review targeting fouls during a game.
LINK
Last season, the targeting rule was implemented and any player committing the penalty would be ejected and his team assessed a 15-yard penalty.
The committee recommended that if the instant replay official rules that a disqualification should not have occurred, and if the targeting foul is not accompanied by another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for targeting should not be enforced.
However, if the targeting foul is committed in conjunction with another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for that personal foul remains. For example, if a player is called for roughing the passer and targeting the head and neck area, but the instant replay official rules that targeting did not occur, the player flagged would remain in the game, but the roughing the passer penalty would still be enforced.
All rules proposals must be approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which will discuss the football rules changes March 6. The proposed changes are being circulated for membership comment.
“Overall, the targeting rule was successful and has had the intended impact of making play safer,” said Troy Calhoun, head coach at the Air Force Academy and chair of the committee, which met Monday through Thursday in Indianapolis. “This alteration keeps the intent of the rule, but allows replay to correct all of the consequences from a rare missed call.”
In games where instant replay is not in use, the committee recommended an option to permit on-field officials to review targeting calls during halftime that were made during the first half. This is a permissive rule by conference policy or mutual consent of the teams and is the responsibility of the home team to provide the parameters for the use of video. The review must be conducted by the referee in the officials’ locker room.
Officials could then reverse the targeting call and allow the player to compete in the second half. The committee noted that many Football Championship Subdivision, Division II and Division III games are not played using instant replay so this modification gives those teams greater flexibility to review targeting fouls during a game.
LINK
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:04 am to parkjas2001
thats a lot to read. All I read was the part in bold but yea i guess that makes sense
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:08 am to parkjas2001
Thank goodness. That shite cost us a game last season
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:08 am to parkjas2001
I read all of it. All of these rules I just think are unnecessary. These people that are sueing the NCAA should be dealing with it. They signed up for football and played it professionally and collegiately. They're the reason that we have people like Mark E. And Roger G. Who want 25225689 rules just to save their arse from getting fired. And then look like heroes when nothing happens for a while.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:37 am to parkjas2001
Saban finally gets something right.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:42 am to parkjas2001
I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:45 am to Aman
quote:
I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.
Agreed...thank god for timeouts.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:46 am to Aman
Clearly no one agrees about the proposed rule you're referring to. I am curious as to why you had to stir that shite in this tread and couldn't just stick to the topic?
Good on them for realizing the obvious faults of the targeting rule.
Good on them for realizing the obvious faults of the targeting rule.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:48 am to Aman
I also agree that turkey sandwiches are superior to ham sandwiches.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:57 am to parkjas2001
quote:
The committee recommended that if the instant replay official rules that a disqualification should not have occurred, and if the targeting foul is not accompanied by another personal foul, the 15-yard penalty for targeting should not be enforced.
Way too logical of a proposal to pass through the Rules Committee
Posted on 2/17/14 at 11:05 am to parkjas2001
Saban has been advocating for this rule change all season. Must be an evil conspiracy to help hard hitting secondaries.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 11:07 am to Monticello
quote:
Every coach has been advocating for this rule change all season.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 11:10 am to Aman
quote:
I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.
Actually, I think most people here would agree that this is stupid. Defenses can sub whenever they want, they just have to be quick about it if a team is in HUNH. Too often a team gets flagged because the guy being subbed out is hardly jogging to get off the field. Have your team man up and sprint off the field if you want to sub when an offense is going up tempo.
This coming from a fan of a team that hardly ever runs HUNH.
Popular
Back to top
