Started By
Message

re: 9 game sec schedule is more fun for fans

Posted on 10/27/26 at 9:57 am to
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
71778 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 9:57 am to
I agree. The other leagues have been borderline unwatchable by comparison.
Posted by Hawgleg
Member since Jan 2022
757 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 11:52 am to
Not sure how an SEC football fan has watched SEC football this year and not say -- " I Want More". Bring me 24 team playoff, 9 game seasons and lets roll.
Will be great having playoff games in Early to Mid Dec when not much is happening.
Basketball slows down and it will be fun.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
76996 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Yup. I knew UGA fans would be the first to complain about a 9-game conference schedule. Here we are.


UF should complain too. Like UGA, one of your 12 games is at a neutral site, losing a home game opportunity every other year. You also have an annual ACC rivalry where you lose a home game every other year. And at 8 games, we'd try to also schedule an Oregon/Clemson/Notre Dame. Those are the games we are going to lose so we can get another game with Mississippi State.
Posted by Raz
Member since Oct 2006
8619 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

9 game sec schedule is more fun for fans


I think a 9 game sec schedule with 10 sec teams would be badass. Everyone plays everyone every year.
Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
51078 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Texas Man


These bitches will complain about any and everything. First they complain that the schedule is harder making it more difficult to get in the playoff. Then they complain about expanding the playoff.

They don't care if they make any sense or not. They think people are out to get them.
Posted by Demosthenian
Zetto, Granite Bowl, & points btwn
Member since Sep 2021
1065 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

we'd try to also schedule an Oregon/Clemson/Notre Dame.
This is disingenuous. You should compare the 9th conference game to the lowest-revenue earning non-con game. That is the legitimate trade-off. Canceling a high-revenue earning game is the part that the AD is choosing.

There are 3 other non-con games we also schedule. Given one is GT, there are two slots we’re totally free to select an opponent beyond the game you cite (i.e. the Oregon/Clemson/Notre Dame premier FBS non-con opponent slot). In those slots, UGA like everybody else schedules cupcakes.

A 9th SEC game is better for fans, and better for revenue, than a non-con cupcake game
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
28333 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:18 pm to
quote:


A 9th SEC game is better for fans, and better for revenue, than a non-con cupcake game


Sure.

But teams are canceling Clemson, FSU, and Louisville.

And why?

Because the goal isn't to win a game in September.
The goal is to win games in January.

When the regular season doesn't matter and the biggest goal for the head coach and athletic department is good health in January, why would any team schedule 2 P4 OOC games?
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
28333 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:25 pm to
quote:


A 9th SEC game is better for fans, and better for revenue, than a non-con cupcake game


Texas used to schedule 2 P4 OOC opponents back when they were in the shitty BigXII.

They aren't doing it anymore in the SEC.

But I would rather my AD control the quality of that extra game than to put it into a round robin with 15 other teams.

Especially since everyone's third favorite hobby is bitching about conference scheduling inequalities.
This post was edited on 10/27/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
76996 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

This is disingenuous.


I don't think you know what disingenuous means. Nothing in my post is disingenuous.
Posted by tBrand
Member since Oct 2022
5107 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Texas used to schedule 2 P4 OOC opponents back when they were in the shitty BigXII.

That happened 6 times in the 27 years Texas was in the Big 12.
Posted by G&P
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2013
2546 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 2:56 pm to
Yes. Great for fans.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37870 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

you can do 8 conference games and 2 P4 OOC games like Alabama and a few others were trying to make happen without a mathematical penalty on the conference.




This is my preferred outcome

It avoids the uneven number of home vs road SEC games and allows more interesting out of conference big name games.

The idea of the SEC and Big 10 doing two game series based on the prior couple of years conference standings is very cool. With two ooc games mandated you can do that at the start of the year and keep your other rivalry games against Clemson, FSU, Ga Tech or what have you
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
28333 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

That happened 6 times in the 27 years Texas was in the Big 12.


Georgia has done it 14 times in the past 27 years (26 since we have been canceling the 2nd P4 since the 9th conference game started).

We even scheduled 3 OOC P4 opponents in the past.

The athletic department has an identity to keep our traditions alive.
And to schedule opponents that our fans want to see.

We get zero say in conference scheduling and it kind of pisses me off that the trade-off is so poor for this extra game.

Texas coming from the BIG XII, of course you get excited seeing Arkansas more often.

Posted by Demosthenian
Zetto, Granite Bowl, & points btwn
Member since Sep 2021
1065 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

I don't think you know what disingenuous means. Nothing in my post is disingenuous
“Disingenuous” is more polite than “intellectually dishonest”. I’m trying to be discerning here.

I mean, surely you already knew what I wrote in response, my post was for passersby.

To be clear, the above is a polite way of not asking the alternative, which is if you’re just stupid
This post was edited on 10/27/26 at 9:38 pm
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
33052 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

Y’all haven’t even played at Texas A&M in 15 years
yeah it's crazy - why have the Aggies been frightened to have UGA on the schedule? did they negotiate this when they joined, or was it a concession to make them feel better about adding Texas
Posted by Demosthenian
Zetto, Granite Bowl, & points btwn
Member since Sep 2021
1065 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

Sure. But teams are canceling Clemson, FSU, and Louisville. And why?

Because the goal isn't to win a game in September. The goal is to win games in January.

When the regular season doesn't matter and the biggest goal for the head coach and athletic department is good health in January, why would any team schedule 2 P4 OOC games?
We all know why *the ADs* are doing this. It’s definitely not for the fans
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
33052 posts
Posted on 10/27/26 at 9:44 pm to
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter