Started By
Message
re: 2011 Bama or 95 Nebraksa
Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:45 pm to TxTiger82
Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:45 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Well 95 Nebraska never lost, especially not at home.
I think that settles it.
This is beyond settled.
1995 Nebraska had a season so dominant it might never be duplicated. Alabama lost a game in 2011, so the argument is just over.
2011 Alabama still fielded one of the best defenses ever seen in college football. 2008 USC had one that I'd say it just about even with it, but I have a feeling even comparing those teams would show Alabama having the edge.
1
Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:10 pm to Ross
Not to mention, 95 Nebraska won by an average of 39 points per game. There is no way we will see a team that dominant again.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:17 pm to tider04
quote:see i disagree there. you can say how you won all of these titles but no one would argue that NU was a lot more dominant. NU lost 3 games......3 frickING GAMES from 93-97. that will never be matched. you can say how you won all these titles, but it wont be on the same level of domination of osborne's NU teams
.another NC in the next 2-3 years and it's not even a discussion about which dynasty was better.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:22 pm to WestCoastAg
Technically it can be matched...
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:23 pm to Mobtro
well you guys can only lose 1 more game in the next 3 years to match it
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 4:25 pm
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News