Started By
Message
UGA Board Diplomacy Thread™
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:37 pm
First order of business....
NYCAuburn
This guy wasn't voted in.
His first transgression is the fact he is an auburn fan and they don't let non-aubs on their board, so he shouldn't be on this board.
His second transgression is that he wasn't voted in.
Please link me to the thread where he was voted in.
DamnGoodDawg.... we need you now... now more than ever.
NYCAuburn
This guy wasn't voted in.
His first transgression is the fact he is an auburn fan and they don't let non-aubs on their board, so he shouldn't be on this board.
His second transgression is that he wasn't voted in.
Please link me to the thread where he was voted in.
DamnGoodDawg.... we need you now... now more than ever.
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 11:16 pm
11
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:56 pm to deeprig9
You forgot the ™.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:12 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Diplomacy
I agree with the need to flush this terd, but......"Diplomacy" doesn't apply here, imo.
Deeprig, When the 14 posters of the USCe Bored held a vote on whether to kick you off, it was "diplomatic" because you had been voted on to their Bored to begin with, right? And when I was voted off of their Bored it was fair and diplomatic becuase I had also been voted on to their board to begin with, right?
But, this is different. This useless rabble from new york of all places was never voted on to our board, so why does he deserve diplomacy? He's like a yankee version of a mexican that snuck over the border and now wants welfare.
I say, Kick his arse off, and let him get in line to apply for citizenship the right way like everyone else has to.
Imo, this is now a referendum on DGD and whether fair is fair...................
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:17 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Imo, this is now a referendum on DGD and whether fair is fair..........
Agreed.
Now more than Ever.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:20 pm to Jefferson Dawg
I also say Hawg rhymes with Dawg and Christopher rhymes with Bitchopher, so guests should be allowed to vote in this.
Litigator, this is an important opportunity.
Litigator, this is an important opportunity.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:22 pm to deeprig9
I don't really follow the whole situation as far as being allowed to post on other's boards (why would any dawg fan want to post on another team's board anyway?), but two questions come to mind:
1. Why do the admins allow access to some posters without any process to post on other boards?
2. Why not have a blocking option similar to facebook if it that big a deal to some people.
I think the answer is that some of these dudes know admins in real life and get special treatment. Doesn't matter much to me, but once the season starts it may become more of an issue if my dream of an undefeated season isn't fulfilled and uninvited posters from lucky winners come running their mouths.
1. Why do the admins allow access to some posters without any process to post on other boards?
2. Why not have a blocking option similar to facebook if it that big a deal to some people.
I think the answer is that some of these dudes know admins in real life and get special treatment. Doesn't matter much to me, but once the season starts it may become more of an issue if my dream of an undefeated season isn't fulfilled and uninvited posters from lucky winners come running their mouths.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:25 pm to cantseefade1
Let's take it one thing at a time.
That's a good question. That's what we are trying to answer here today.
Your other concerns should go on the help board. LINK
Let's do this one thing at a time.
quote:
1. Why do the admins allow access to some posters without any process to post on other boards?
That's a good question. That's what we are trying to answer here today.
Your other concerns should go on the help board. LINK
Let's do this one thing at a time.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:25 pm to deeprig9
So a guy starts a great thread and you want him booted? I don't get it. He's never caused problems here despite what y'all say.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:28 pm to gatorhata9
gatahata9, are you willing to attach your future to NYCAuburn? That's called "vouching".
That means if he goes, you go. Because you vouched.
Are you vouching? Or just expressing an opinion?
That means if he goes, you go. Because you vouched.
Are you vouching? Or just expressing an opinion?
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:32 pm to deeprig9
No. I'm just curious to know what inflammatory posts NYC has made that have y'all so hot and bothered.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:41 pm to gatorhata9
quote:
No. I'm just curious to know what inflammatory posts NYC has made that have y'all so hot and bothered.
Your answer is non-responsive to the question.
Actually, you answered no, to the the question of whether or not you vouch for him.
But the first question, about whether or not he was voted in or whether or not it's fair to let aubies post here when they don't let us post there, you haven't responded to.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 11:44 pm to deeprig9
I disapprove of his presence and vote for removal.
Posted on 5/31/14 at 12:45 am to deeprig9
DGD, is peter buck banned?
Posted on 5/31/14 at 1:00 am to cantseefade1
If this can really happen finally, I'm all for it.
I vote removal in this case. He never adds value to this board
I vote removal in this case. He never adds value to this board
Posted on 5/31/14 at 1:41 am to IT_Dawg
Value? His Ga BBQ thread is one of the better threads this board has seen in a LONG time. Useful information while gathering input from the board.
If you want the guy banned just because he's here and we don't have access to the auburn board? Fine, I get that reasoning. But anyone who says he flames and doesn't add value isn't looking closely.
If you want the guy banned just because he's here and we don't have access to the auburn board? Fine, I get that reasoning. But anyone who says he flames and doesn't add value isn't looking closely.
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:10 am to gatorhata9
quote:
Value? His Ga BBQ thread is one of the better threads this board has seen in a LONG time.
You're confused. That's Porter Osbourne Jr's thread.
Posted on 5/31/14 at 2:56 am to deeprig9
Ahhh, an internet wannabe mafioso.
Posted on 5/31/14 at 7:45 am to FaCubeItches
I just have some questions about this situation.
1. Why do fans of other teams want access to our board unless it is to antagonize, or to take a subject from here back to their board.
2. Is the SECrant not the board where teams from different fan bases interact if so why does anyone from another fan base need access to the Georgia board.
We have enough fans with positive and negative and realistic views of our team that I don't think a fan from another team is going to add anything.
1. Why do fans of other teams want access to our board unless it is to antagonize, or to take a subject from here back to their board.
2. Is the SECrant not the board where teams from different fan bases interact if so why does anyone from another fan base need access to the Georgia board.
We have enough fans with positive and negative and realistic views of our team that I don't think a fan from another team is going to add anything.
Posted on 5/31/14 at 7:47 am to deeprig9
Deerpig why are you of all people dragging these retarded issues around still. who gives a actual frick what other boards do etc. This Orwell shite yall keep getting so mental with is gonna get a few of you put on a watch list or something
Posted on 5/31/14 at 8:00 am to deeprig9
NYC,
Start a topic on the Auburn board supporting opening the gates, be an advocate for fairness.
Start a topic on the Auburn board supporting opening the gates, be an advocate for fairness.
Page 1 of 4
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News