Started By
Message
re: Zimmerman not guilty
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:42 pm to sorantable
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:42 pm to sorantable
quote:
STFU you dumbfrick.
Is anyone happy Trayvon is dead? No.
Is anyone glad Zimmerman is not guilty? Yes.
Keep it straight, you bleeding heart piece of shite.
He was talking about the picture of the body outline made out of skittles that was posted.
2
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:43 pm to Stonehog
Because it was a bullshite case driven entirely by social media and it should've never been in court to begin with.
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:44 pm to rtr14
quote:
He was talking about the picture of the body outline made out of skittles that was posted.
Oh. Carry on then.
ETA: My jimmies are a bit rustled.
This post was edited on 7/13/13 at 11:45 pm
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:44 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Why?
Because our judicial system dictates it to be so.
The prosecution presented nothing that warranted sending a man to jail for a large portion of his life. Nothing at all. It's all emotional appeal that tries to bypass the rule of law.
This post was edited on 7/13/13 at 11:45 pm
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:44 pm to rtr14
quote:
He was talking about the picture of the body outline made out of skittles that was posted.
I don't even give a shite about this trial, but that picture is in bad taste. But Roger Klarvin posted it so I can't say I'm surprised.
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:45 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Stonehog
I love you, dog.
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:46 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
It's all emotional appeal that tries to bypass the rule of law.
Sounds like one of your abortion threads.
But that's a different topic altogether, I won't derail.
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:47 pm to sorantable
quote:
Peace Bro
All good brah
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:49 pm to Stonehog
Stonehog, we're having a civil war on the Ark board.
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:50 pm to FleaMarketBill
Woo hoo!
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:52 pm to Stonehog
I admit that when I heard the verdict on the radio while driving down the highway, I spit my Skittles all over the windshield.
Then I thought, "Well that was odd timing."
Then I thought, "Well that was odd timing."
This post was edited on 7/14/13 at 12:01 am
Posted on 7/13/13 at 11:56 pm to Stonehog
Yeah, you didn't follow the trial. I buy that. 
Your butthurt is palpable.
Your butthurt is palpable.
Posted on 7/14/13 at 12:29 am to Roger Klarvin
Stop touching my butt, Aggy.
Posted on 7/14/13 at 12:39 am to Stonehog
My twitter and Facebook are retarded right now. I'm probably going to have take a break from social media for a few days.
All I hear is Zimmerman this, and Trayvon that...I'm just all "When the frick does football season start?!"
All I hear is Zimmerman this, and Trayvon that...I'm just all "When the frick does football season start?!"
Posted on 7/14/13 at 12:50 am to crispyUGA
A friend of mine found this on twitter and posted it on Facebook with the caption what the f is wrong with people.
Posted on 7/14/13 at 12:55 am to 478rebel
Wow.........i have no words
Posted on 7/14/13 at 12:55 am to sorantable
quote:
Because it was a bullshite case driven entirely by social media and it should've never been in court to begin with.
+1
Posted on 7/14/13 at 12:58 am to crispyUGA
It's a shameful result.
The legal reasoning is more than likely correct, the statute it's based on is absurd.
A man ignored professional advice, acted recklessly and dangerously, and used a degree of force well above that which was used against him. Manslaughter is a more than just verdict for this crime. Instead we get this. You'd have to be particularly callous and maintain an extraordinarily high degree of cognitive dissonance to take joy or even solace in this result.
The legal reasoning is more than likely correct, the statute it's based on is absurd.
A man ignored professional advice, acted recklessly and dangerously, and used a degree of force well above that which was used against him. Manslaughter is a more than just verdict for this crime. Instead we get this. You'd have to be particularly callous and maintain an extraordinarily high degree of cognitive dissonance to take joy or even solace in this result.
Posted on 7/14/13 at 1:00 am to CHSgc
No..just no.
quote:
It's a shameful result.
The legal reasoning is more than likely correct, the statute it's based on is absurd.
A man ignored professional advice, acted recklessly and dangerously, and used a degree of force well above that which was used against him. Manslaughter is a more than just verdict for this crime. Instead we get this. You'd have to be particularly callous and maintain an extraordinarily high degree of cognitive dissonance to take joy or even solace in this result.
Posted on 7/14/13 at 1:04 am to southpontotoc31
quote:
No..just no.
Use your words. Explain.
Page 8 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News