Started By
Message
re: Might Barack Obama run again? Who is going to stop him?
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:23 pm to antibarner
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:23 pm to antibarner
Andrew Jackson basically told the Supreme Court to drop dead,and ignored a decision they made in a case involving the Cherokee Indians and the state of Georgia. So it has happened before.
If Obama,the chief law enforcement officer in the land,tells Congress and the courts to shove it,who is going to do anything about it?
If Obama,the chief law enforcement officer in the land,tells Congress and the courts to shove it,who is going to do anything about it?
2
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:25 pm to antibarner
Black Pawn Martyr....or should I say Karl Pawn Marx..LOL.
Instead of telling me how wrong I am,let's hear what you stand for. If you have the guts.
Instead of telling me how wrong I am,let's hear what you stand for. If you have the guts.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:26 pm to antibarner
Hmm
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:28 pm to UMRealist
You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.
Rahm Emanuel
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:30 pm to antibarner
Umm who did not pass Civics?
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:31 pm to antibarner
And I thought your posts on the rant were bad...
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:32 pm to Charlestondawg
Rahm is a ballerina.
The next good politician out of Chicago will be the first.
The next good politician out of Chicago will be the first.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:35 pm to the808bass
On that we agree the 808 Bass..I can't think of the first decent one. Mayor Daley stole the 1960 election for Jack Kennedy. Al Capone and the Mob had all the pols in their pockets. On and On.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:36 pm to antibarner
quote:
let's hear what you stand for.
Smaller government. More equal share of power amongst the 3 branches. TERM LIMITS FOR CONGRESS. Not allowing corporations to donate to politicians. Making contributions smaller per person making the politicians seek out the people more for votes. More state power on social issues. Greater fiscal conservatism. Less military spending. A break down of the 2 red/blue parties and an influx in other parties to water down their corruption and control.
quote:
Karl Pawn Marx..LOL.
I bet you didn't realize how stupid you sounded when you made this ridiculous quote. That's like me saying you are antibrainer and then putting a LoL after it as if it was funny. Just lame.
This post was edited on 6/1/14 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:38 pm to the808bass
quote:
The next good politician out of Chicago will be the first.
Truer words were never typed.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:39 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Not allowing corporations to donate to politicians.
Any corporation that cannot donate to politicians cannot have its revenues counted as pass-through revenues for the purposes of taxation and no corporations can file racial or gender discrimination suits. Then I would be fine with your rule.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:41 pm to antibarner
quote:
What's the matter KS?..you don't know? Did you take American History?
Lol at the guy who doesn't know about the 22nd amendment.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:43 pm to KSGamecock
LOL at you KS..we have a President that ignores the Constitution.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:43 pm to antibarner
I want to point to these threads to remind the likes of Mizz_cou and stonehog the difference between rational and irrational conservatives.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:48 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
OK BPMartyr,I can agree with some of that. Smaller government,sure. And the Founders meant for there to be three equal branches so fine there. I agree with term limits too.I don't think we should limit contributions but I do think we should eliminate lobbyists.
State power? check. Greater fiscal conservatism? If you mean less spending check. But I do NOT support less military spending . I do support forcing them to be far less wasteful than they are.
Maybe have generic ballots,I could support that but outlawing parties? nah.
State power? check. Greater fiscal conservatism? If you mean less spending check. But I do NOT support less military spending . I do support forcing them to be far less wasteful than they are.
Maybe have generic ballots,I could support that but outlawing parties? nah.
This post was edited on 6/1/14 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:52 pm to antibarner
quote:
Who is going to stop him?
The REC
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:53 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Didn't read, shut the frick up
I lol'ed IRL.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:56 pm to antibarner
quote:
Greater fiscal conservatism? If you mean less spending check. But I do NOT support less military spending .
Does not compute. You can't take 20% of the budget and say "we can make no cuts here, but we need to make 10% cuts in the rest of the budget." It's not realistic.
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:58 pm to antibarner
Antibarner's Greatest Hits™
1. Someone stop the Gay Gestapo!
2. Global Warning alarmists are members of "a Neo-Religious Cult that worships Gaia along with the rest of the kooks."
3. The President won't stop Boko Haram because he is a muslim!
4. The Japanese were about to invade the West Coast after Pearl Harbor but stopped because of the NRA
5. My local weatherman sucks so Climate Change is a lie
6. The President is "His Majesty Hussein I"
7. If you support the ACA you are a communist and should move to Cuba
....and so much more
1. Someone stop the Gay Gestapo!
2. Global Warning alarmists are members of "a Neo-Religious Cult that worships Gaia along with the rest of the kooks."
3. The President won't stop Boko Haram because he is a muslim!
4. The Japanese were about to invade the West Coast after Pearl Harbor but stopped because of the NRA
5. My local weatherman sucks so Climate Change is a lie
6. The President is "His Majesty Hussein I"
7. If you support the ACA you are a communist and should move to Cuba
....and so much more
This post was edited on 6/1/14 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 6/1/14 at 10:01 pm to the808bass
I don't think you just cut the military budget. What you need is a much better accounting of how they spend what they do.The world is too dangerous to cut forces at this time. what we need is a bigger Army and the best equipped military we can have.Someone needs to be in charge of it all,the military buck stops here,so to speak.
This post was edited on 6/1/14 at 10:02 pm
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News