Started By
Message
re: Do you support bombing Syria?
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:38 pm to Supravol22
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:38 pm to Supravol22
I didn't support Iraq, and I certainly don't support this. All we're going to end up doing is putting Muslim extremists in control like we did in Afghanistan many years ago. Look how that one turned out
1
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:39 pm to mograyback
Thanks for keeping Reynolds Wrap in business, bud.
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:40 pm to mograyback
While the Libertarian Party has some legit points, the fact that people like you make up a majority of it really keeps it from being successful.
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:42 pm to Bama Bird
Muslim extremists have been in control in the Middle East since history has been recorded. They're always going to fight. It's not our obligation to step in, but it is a capability I don't have a problem with. Bombing the shite out of evil people doesn't make me lose sleep at night
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:43 pm to Supravol22
NO. Going into Syria is a mistake and a waste of time, money and most importantly American lives.
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:44 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
You guys want to know how I know our country is full of fricking idiots?
quote:
Worldwide Trends
· Change
#KatilEmperyalizmOrtadogudanDefol
Siria
#Mileyasssmallerthan
Robin Thicke
#FelizDiaDelActor
#LadyGagaNoTeCortes
#theslaughterhasbegun
Syria
Justin Timberlake
Old Trafford
This post was edited on 8/26/13 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:45 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:45 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
It's about the stability. The current regime doesn't threaten the US. The new one very well could, and that has happened to us before
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:48 pm to mograyback
quote:
Change title to: Do you support starting WW3
Neither Russia nor anyone else will be directly taking us on to support Bashar Assad and the ones that will take indirect actions to support him (Iran) are already doing it.
Having said that, there isn't a single good thing that will come of it. At best, you'll just wind up with Assad the sequel. More likely, you'll end up with an Iranian or Al-Qaeda puppet with a shaitload of chemical weapons at their disposal.
Posted on 8/26/13 at 2:48 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
While the Libertarian Party has some legit points, the fact that people like you make up a majority of it really keeps it from being successful.
I don't have a party.
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:01 pm to mograyback
The U.S. is backing Syrian Rebels, who have Al Qeada backing and is tied with other terrorist groups.
washington times article
quote:
Testimony from victims strongly suggests it was the rebels, not the Syrian government, that used Sarin nerve gas during a recent incident in the revolution-wracked nation, a senior U.N. diplomat said Monday.
quote:
But she said her panel had not yet seen any evidence of Syrian government forces using chemical weapons, according to the BBC, but she added that more investigation was needed.
Damascus has recently facing growing Western accusations that its forces used such weapons, which President Obama has described as crossing a red line.
washington times article
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:04 pm to Alahunter
Yeah, I know..
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:06 pm to Alahunter
I've always thought it would make more sense for the rebels to do it and then blame the government since they're losing the war. Getting the West involved through something like this would definitely be to their advantage
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:07 pm to mograyback
The other thing is that the U.S. had been training Syrian rebels since 2012, and they recently moved across the border, shortly BEFORE the chemical attack happened. Over 700 rebels were trained by CIA operatives.
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:14 pm to Alahunter
quote:
The other thing is that the U.S. had been training Syrian rebels since 2012, and they recently moved across the border, shortly BEFORE the chemical attack happened. Over 700 rebels were trained by CIA operatives
It is interesting that this kinda stuff isn't more well known..
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:15 pm to mograyback
quote:
I don't have a party.
Yeah you do
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:17 pm to mograyback
Seems there may have just been another chemical attack. Syrian Gov't has allowed UN inspectors access to the other attack scene, and now they would attack again?
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:21 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Vols&Shaft83
Dude, you're an idiot. Cool 'Rand Paul' bumper sticker, I've been on the Paul train since I was 16. Over 10 years. Its now a 'trendy' thing because people are finally 'sort of' waking up. I've now moved on a bit, maybe where I'm at now will be trendy in another 10 years. Which of course will be too late, just as getting on the Paul wagon now is too late.
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:24 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Seems there may have just been another chemical attack. Syrian Gov't has allowed UN inspectors access to the other attack scene, and now they would attack again?
You're definitely more in the loop on this than me.. It's hard for me to follow events as they happen because I have so little trust in what I'm told. Usually let things settle for a bit and then go back and dig for what really happened.
Posted on 8/26/13 at 3:25 pm to mograyback
Twitter says that there are reports of chemical attack on town of OramAlKabira & Muhandiseen in South Aleppo Province - hospitals overwhelmed
Page 2 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News