Started By
Message
re: 9/11 Was A Conspiracy!
Posted on 6/27/14 at 11:54 am to Sleeping Tiger
Posted on 6/27/14 at 11:54 am to Sleeping Tiger
That's why it was an addendum at the bottom of the post and not the entire point of the post which you continue to ignore, because it was a big contributing factor but not the prime reason for collapse.
You continue to bring up skyscrapers that withstood fire, but do you understand that not all fire has the same temperature. The material undergoing combustion is the most relevant information when determining temperature. Like I said, I've said all I really can about how steel loses something on the order of 80% of its tensile strength at temperatures above 1000 degrees Celsius.
You continue to bring up skyscrapers that withstood fire, but do you understand that not all fire has the same temperature. The material undergoing combustion is the most relevant information when determining temperature. Like I said, I've said all I really can about how steel loses something on the order of 80% of its tensile strength at temperatures above 1000 degrees Celsius.
This post was edited on 6/28/14 at 2:59 pm
2
Posted on 6/27/14 at 11:54 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
The skeleton, but not the spine? Well why didn't you say so? Now it all makes sense.
Stay tuned to make sure it's relevant.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 11:56 am to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Even if they could withstand the impact of an airplane I was saying that as an addition to structural weakness caused by the heat of combustion there were structures destroyed by the impact leading to failure. Thought that was evident.
How familiar are you with the design of the towers?
Any structural damage from impact was to the skeleton, not the spine of the building.
Very familiar and very wrong. While some damage was to the exterior, the plane damaged several columns on impact and scraped away fire-proofing on many others, making the few structurally "intact" columns that much more vulnerable to heat. With the jet fuel and office materials providing plenty of heat, once columns started to fail, there was no stopping the collapse.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 11:56 am to Ross
Im pretty sure we can all agree that it was the jews fault
Posted on 6/27/14 at 11:59 am to Ross
quote:
You continue to being up skyscrapers that withstood fire, but do you understand that not all fire has the same temperature. The material undergoing combustion is the relevant information when determining temperature. Like I said, I've said all I really can about how steel loses something on the order of 80% of it's tensile strength at temperatures above 1000 degrees Celsius.
In 100 years no steel high rise has collapsed due to fire, yet 3 did on one day. I need to find that razor of Occam's because I need to shave.
You've shared that steel loses integrity when heated, yet you've not applied it to this case in any way. You haven't applied it to the way these buildings were designed.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:00 pm to kingbob
quote:
making the few structurally "intact" columns that much more vulnerable to heat.
You don't know anything about the design of the building, it's apparent.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:00 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Im pretty sure we can all agree that it was the jews fault
Dude. ....
You may be on to something here.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:00 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
In 100 years no steel high rise has collapsed due to fire, yet 3 did on one day. I need to find that razor of Occam's because I need to shave.
You've shared that steel loses integrity when heated, yet you've not applied it to this case in any way. You haven't applied it to the way these buildings were designed.
did you post this with a straight face or do you cover your eyes when reading, similar to a kid with his fingers in his ears.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:01 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
You don't know anything about the design of the building, it's apparent.
You dont know anything about the actual event
quote:
it's apparent.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:01 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Dude. ....
You may be on to something here.
Ill be the first to admit we cant be trusted.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:02 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
Stay tuned to make sure it's relevant.
Comment makes no sense.
Wasn't the phrase 'this isn't relevant' in the post and same sentence when I said planes have hit skyscrapers resulting in no collapse?
If so, this comment is as dumb as your misuse of the term doublespeak.
This post was edited on 6/27/14 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:03 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Im pretty sure we can all agree that it was the jews fault
I defy you to name one thing that isn't.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:03 pm to Sleeping Tiger
lol I bet there weren't many examples of a building undergoing structural damage and then being subjected to 1700 degree temperatures for 30 minutes to an hour.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:03 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
did you post this with a straight face or do you cover your eyes when reading, similar to a kid with his fingers in his ears.
What's not true about that post?
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:04 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
I defy you to name one thing that isn't.
Priests fondling little boys. Dont pin that shite on us.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:05 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Priests fondling little boys. Dont pin that shite on us.
Jews 1
Catholics 0
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:06 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
making the few structurally "intact" columns that much more vulnerable to heat.
You don't know anything about the design of the building, it's apparent.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You are so deluded, it's scary that you exist.
Let me draw you a picture in your mind:
Plane hits building curtain wall (little structural damage, mostly cosmetic), plane continues moving through the building (destroys or heavily damages many columns), debris is thrown around on impact scraping away and damaging fireproofing, it finally stops near the middle of the building, fuel ignites and explodes lighting combustible office materials on fire as well, heat from fire slowly burns through remaining fire-proofing until heat reaches steel, steel loses its compressive and tensile strength as it is heated and fails, as each column fails, each other column has to support a greater load to make up for it, as each column fails it makes the next column more likely to fail, the columns on one floor have failed and the floors above begin to fall to the next set of columns which fail necessarily as they weren't capable of holding up the extra load, this chain reaction occurs at near the speed of gravity and you have a vertical collapse.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:07 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
What's not true about that post?
umm the second line. I hope for your sake you are just trolling and not the idiot you portray on here. You are being quite hypocritical and obtuse in your debate
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:08 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
Priests fondling little boys. Dont pin that shite on us.
Unless those "priests" are actually jews who are trying to subvert the Roman Catholic church and cause it to fail...
Posted on 6/27/14 at 12:08 pm to TreyAnastasio
I knew it was you Trey.
Who has the most to gain from 9/11?! Trey! Who was nowhere to be found the morning the towers fell?! Trey! Who dropped the deuce in the urinal?! Trey. You almost got away with it, you sneaky butthole.
Who has the most to gain from 9/11?! Trey! Who was nowhere to be found the morning the towers fell?! Trey! Who dropped the deuce in the urinal?! Trey. You almost got away with it, you sneaky butthole.
Page 16 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News