Started By
Message

re: New turf?

Posted on 5/16/21 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by blueprint_one
Columbia, MO
Member since Oct 2015
1307 posts
Posted on 5/16/21 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

You’re fighting a losing fight. The Block M helmet is back. The old field is next. Hell. Drinks this or that bit on Twitter has him choosing the block M over the oval tiger head.



Lets see what they actually do, I'm not sure the modern look is actually going away completely.
Posted by Drydock
Osage County
Member since Oct 2013
6756 posts
Posted on 5/16/21 at 12:42 pm to
Drink has said many times that it is the kids who have been asking for the more traditional look. Anything to get them on campus and keep them.
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15531 posts
Posted on 5/16/21 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Although it looks more SEC and traditional, I think Mizzou should stick to a modern look.



I disagree. Mizzou isn't good enough (at anything) to be a "trendsetter" and go against the grain. We're best served to try and assimilate as much as possible with the rest of the SEC, including our branding. Just my opinion though.
Posted by Drydock
Osage County
Member since Oct 2013
6756 posts
Posted on 5/16/21 at 1:47 pm to
Resistance is futile.
Posted by surgicalvenom
Omaha
Member since Jan 2014
5368 posts
Posted on 5/16/21 at 3:14 pm to
The tiger head should stay as the main logo of Mizzou athletics. Michigan wins the "M " battle. But as far as football, the "M" is the better look. IMHO. Bama has the elephant, but football is numbers only, Michigan is the "M" except football helmets. So we would be no different.
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 5/16/21 at 10:48 pm to
Yes, I don’t really care about using the Tiger head elsewhere and it’s fine for the main logo, but Block M on the helmets please
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19257 posts
Posted on 5/17/21 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Yes, I don’t really care about using the Tiger head elsewhere and it’s fine for the main logo, but Block M on the helmets please

I'm a fan of the oval tiger logo, but the Block M is clean and classy.
Posted by McMillan
Member since Jul 2018
5926 posts
Posted on 5/22/21 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Mizzou isn't good enough (at anything) to be a "trendsetter" and go against the grain
I disagree. Oregon was a nobody in the football world until they began to define themselves with their uniforms. Now they can sit with the alpha males at the table. The culture of no is what’s holding Missourians back in many ways and it needs to end.
This post was edited on 5/22/21 at 10:08 am
Posted by blueprint_one
Columbia, MO
Member since Oct 2015
1307 posts
Posted on 5/23/21 at 8:32 am to
quote:

I disagree. Oregon was a nobody in the football world until they began to define themselves with their uniforms. Now they can sit with the alpha males at the table. The culture of no is what’s holding Missourians back in many ways and it needs to end.


Someone who gets it. The mindset of following everyone else needs to end. Be unique.
Posted by Athos
Member since Sep 2016
11878 posts
Posted on 5/23/21 at 2:56 pm to
Mustard yellow and ditching the M wasn’t the way to go. I’m all for unique. But those discussions sucked then and suck now.
Posted by SEC. 593
Chicago
Member since Aug 2012
4046 posts
Posted on 5/23/21 at 6:18 pm to
They can change uni's every quarter for all I care, but for the love of all that is holy, go back to Old Gold.
Posted by Drydock
Osage County
Member since Oct 2013
6756 posts
Posted on 5/24/21 at 5:44 am to
Yes please.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter