Started By
Message
Congratulations 808bass
Posted on 12/8/19 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 12/8/19 at 6:37 pm
You said it would happen this weekend, and you were right.
1
Posted on 12/8/19 at 6:41 pm to Drydock
My source’s sources were good.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 6:47 pm to the808bass
808 is 100% more reliable than the people that are getting paid to cover this stuff. He's not overstating things in order to get clicks. Maybe he should. 
Posted on 12/8/19 at 6:59 pm to reedus23
it did happen but it doesn't seem to have happened the way 808's sauce thought it happened
Posted on 12/8/19 at 7:04 pm to MIZ_COU
His sources were probably about Anderson
Posted on 12/8/19 at 7:08 pm to wubilli
probably
which doesn't make them wrong.
thank god the board sent Sterk back to the drawing board
which doesn't make them wrong.
thank god the board sent Sterk back to the drawing board
Posted on 12/8/19 at 7:10 pm to the808bass
My man.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 7:30 pm to MIZ_COU
The timing was accurate though.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 7:37 pm to wubilli
quote:
His sources were probably about Anderson
If you think a university is making a hire based on 2 days of research, you’re welcome to that opinion.
It seems obvious that Drink was part of the search from before Thursday. Keep believing Karraker had information.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 7:37 pm to MIZ_COU
Yeah, I really didn’t want Holtz or Monken. And Anderson was just slightly higher on the list in my eyes.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 7:43 pm to the808bass
If you believe Drink was sealed before Thursday good luck to you.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 7:56 pm to wubilli
This stuff is never broken by the media, but no I don’t believe Drink was secured when bass made the post.
I do believe that Sterk had a handshake agreement with Anderson at that time though.
Doesn’t make him wrong. Things change, and thankfully they did
I do believe that Sterk had a handshake agreement with Anderson at that time though.
Doesn’t make him wrong. Things change, and thankfully they did
Posted on 12/8/19 at 8:01 pm to MIZ_COU
Why do people keep referencing a meeting that Sunvold says never took place?
I'm not sure what "list" Sterk was working with, but I'd bet by Thursday he was down to one guy, and the lawyers and agents took over from there. Karraker had nothing, and everyone else was quoting him. Sexton played games like always and the goobers in the Lou bought it.
I'm not sure what "list" Sterk was working with, but I'd bet by Thursday he was down to one guy, and the lawyers and agents took over from there. Karraker had nothing, and everyone else was quoting him. Sexton played games like always and the goobers in the Lou bought it.
This post was edited on 12/8/19 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 12/8/19 at 8:07 pm to Drydock
And I'll bet the P-D was in the can before the official announcement.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 8:08 pm to wubilli
And yet Sterk still managed to meet the timeline I said existed in the middle of the week. Almost like the process wasn’t running like Karraker and DeArmond said.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 8:09 pm to the808bass
It doesn’t really matter. This headline of this post is a misnomer. Everything I know is third hand. It pays to know people who know people.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 8:14 pm to the808bass
Good sauces man. Better than anything the PBS have.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 8:14 pm to the808bass
you think it was drinks all week?
Posted on 12/8/19 at 8:16 pm to MIZ_COU
Not necessarily. I am, however, 99% sure that the top three candidates on Thursday were not Anderson, Holtz or Monken. I do believe Anderson was strongly considered. And then Sexton leaked two other names that were below him to pump his name up as an available coach being considered by P5 teams. I do not think Anderson was ever offered the job.
Posted on 12/8/19 at 8:27 pm to the808bass
Do we know who Drinkwitz's agent is? I suspect Sexton was someone Sterk wanted to avoid.
This post was edited on 12/8/19 at 8:28 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News