Started By
Message

Requesting clarification of "spam" RA category
Posted on 9/4/19 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 9/4/19 at 12:23 pm
If I'm reading the terms of service correctly, even though it's not explicitly defined, "spam" seems to pertain to spam as flagged by e-mail services. (i.e. solicitations, adware, phishing, nigerian prince, etc.)
What should best be used to request oversight for users that "spam the board" with the same topics or only respond with the same phrase again and again?
Thread started by MetryMauler on the Rant as a reference.
What should best be used to request oversight for users that "spam the board" with the same topics or only respond with the same phrase again and again?
Thread started by MetryMauler on the Rant as a reference.
Posted on 9/4/19 at 1:41 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Inappropriate Material/Flame/Personal Attack
But it doesnt really matter. Not sure how Lew opperates, but I believe Chicken or Ice said one time they dont even look at them unless there are 3 RA's
This post was edited on 9/4/19 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 9/4/19 at 2:07 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:Thats why I have 2 alters
I believe Chicken or Ice said one time they dont even look at them unless there are 3 RA's

Posted on 9/4/19 at 2:26 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
3 RA's
I thought they said 6 ra’s was the threshold, that was when they were explaining why LSU fans basically got their way on the rant, because they RA so much
Posted on 9/4/19 at 2:55 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I think both definitions work. I’d prefer “spam” to be more of the former. Someone linking their shitty blog or trying to sell passports. For something like your OP, I would go with “no longer needed”. I see that come through and I assume it’s something unnecessary, unneeded, or just annoying. It could also be a poster going ape shite nuts and posting tons of threads because they’re melting.
I look at every RA that comes in so it doesn’t really matter what the category is to me. Inappropriate material comes in a bit different than the others but that’s it.
When I see an RA I try to determine the context, the OP, their team affiliation, the topic, the troll target, etc. and make a determination. I don’t blindly delete anything just because. I’d prefer this place to be the SEC Rant and not Lew’s Rant. With that being said I am a bit trigger happy with anything UGA- related but I try to maintain a healthy balance. MsGarrison still being able to post should be a huge indicator.
I hope I answered your question. I’ve been drinking hurricane juice and on my phone so who knows.

I look at every RA that comes in so it doesn’t really matter what the category is to me. Inappropriate material comes in a bit different than the others but that’s it.
When I see an RA I try to determine the context, the OP, their team affiliation, the topic, the troll target, etc. and make a determination. I don’t blindly delete anything just because. I’d prefer this place to be the SEC Rant and not Lew’s Rant. With that being said I am a bit trigger happy with anything UGA- related but I try to maintain a healthy balance. MsGarrison still being able to post should be a huge indicator.
I hope I answered your question. I’ve been drinking hurricane juice and on my phone so who knows.

Posted on 9/4/19 at 3:20 pm to LewDawg
quote:
For something like your OP, I would go with “no longer needed”.
That makes sense.
May I recommend updating the terms of service to clarify the categories of RA with a short example?
Posted on 9/4/19 at 3:23 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I'll write up something and pass it along. Good idea.
Posted on 9/4/19 at 10:57 pm to LewDawg
quote:
MsGarrison still being able to post should be a huge indicator.

Unban 1BigTigerFan please.
The SEC Rant needs him back.
If we lose to Texas, I'm blaming you.
Posted on 9/5/19 at 7:53 am to BrerTiger
They deleted my thread asking for his reinstatement
I want to know the grounds for his banishment
Posting texas cant lose? to me that’s ridiculous, you can tell someone to kill themselves or state that an sec coaches wife is doing sexually acts on players but you cannot type “texas can’t lose?
Is it for changing his logo to texas? Hundreds of posters do this on the rant for different schools every season for the same reason
I want to know the grounds for his banishment
Posting texas cant lose? to me that’s ridiculous, you can tell someone to kill themselves or state that an sec coaches wife is doing sexually acts on players but you cannot type “texas can’t lose?
Is it for changing his logo to texas? Hundreds of posters do this on the rant for different schools every season for the same reason
Posted on 9/5/19 at 8:20 am to Old Sarge
I thought he was unbanned last night
Posted on 9/5/19 at 8:28 am to deaux
He’s banned until his AVI comes back
Posted on 9/5/19 at 9:23 am to Old Sarge
quote:
I want to know the grounds for his banishment
For deliberately inciting rantards too stupid to spot an obvious joke.
Posted on 9/5/19 at 9:28 am to BrerTiger
quote:
For deliberately inciting rantards too stupid to spot an obvious joke.
I may not get sarcasm or trolling but I got his posts on this one.
Thought they were more funny than mean spirited trolling
If he is banned I would support his unbanning.
FWIW, was he outright trolling or just trying to reverse jinx post to promote a LSU win?
Posted on 9/5/19 at 9:54 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
just trying to reverse jinx post to promote a LSU win?
Mostly this.
He's not the only poster to ever do this but the most prominent and frequent. I won't call out any others because I don't want to see them banned.
I blame people abusing the RA function.
Posted on 9/5/19 at 3:53 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
just trying to reverse jinx post to promote a LSU win?
Wait til I start mine.
Posted on 9/6/19 at 10:55 am to Old Sarge
I don't know why he was banned. I'll see what I can do for him
Posted on 9/6/19 at 11:19 am to LewDawg
Thanks lew
he’s a model poster, doesn’t even cuss

Posted on 9/6/19 at 12:52 pm to LewDawg
quote:
I don't know why he was banned. I'll see what I can do for him



Popular
Back to top
