Started By
Message

re: UGA run game vs AU.

Posted on 11/12/19 at 4:49 pm to
Posted by Peter Buck
Member since Sep 2012
12415 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

We couldn't hit 31 at home against Mizzou and you think we're gonna hit 31 on the rd with their dl ? I hope you're right


The funny thing about having a lead is that you tend to take less risks. MIzz wasn’t scoring, so kicking field goals was a safe call. I think that is Smart’s MO. Score 3 points and don’t let the other team get a win on defense, while letting your defense continue to stifle the opposing team on longer fields. This doesn’t mean the offense was clicking on all cylinders, but If we needed to score 2 TDs in the 4th QTR, I feel like we could have. I believe 1 was called back on a great long throw. I’d like to see the offense a bit more crisp and dynamic, but we are just not going to open things up and play fast when we are up by 3 scores while shutting out the other team.
Posted by Broncothor
Member since Jul 2014
3050 posts
Posted on 11/12/19 at 5:01 pm to
We should have. Little mistakes.
Posted by jodeaux
Member since Sep 2014
1541 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 12:01 pm to
I honestly think the uniformly hysterical reactions to my criticism is far weirder and uncalled for than anything I post. For example, it is 100% FACT that Swift/Herrien is not as good as Chubb/Michel.

Yet, posters react in such a bizarre fashion when I state the obvious. I will never understand that, which is why I don't take any of your crap talking seriously. If you were to objectively read anything I post with a clear head you wouldn't have such strong reactions.

I'd like to think I put things in perspective. I don't sugar coat my analysis of the team. Do I think Swift is a great player? Sure, he's been a little underwhelming this year but he tends to perform well later on in the season. However, anyone who follows the program closely knows he's not Heisman caliber. Not only is it his ability but play calling hampers him as well.

Again, objectively speaking that is 100% correct but feel free to overreact to this analysis if you want. I don't care, I'll keep saying it.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22223 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

I honestly think the uniformly hysterical reactions to my criticism is far weirder and uncalled for than anything I post. For example, it is 100% FACT that Swift/Herrien is not as good as Chubb/Michel


It’s also a fact that Chubb and Sony has nothing to do with the 300 yards we out up running last year vs AU
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27297 posts
Posted on 11/14/19 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

it is 100% FACT that Swift/Herrien is not as good as Chubb/Michel


Who on this board thinks that they are? Not one person here thinks this.

quote:

Not only is it his ability but play calling hampers him as well.

Again, objectively speaking that is 100% correct


What? "Objectively speaking" it's 100% your subjective opinion.Which is usually 90% wrong.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter