Started By
Message
Clemson asterisk?
Posted on 1/6/19 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 1/6/19 at 2:23 pm
If Clemson beats Alabama should their title have asterisk for using peds?
7
Posted on 1/6/19 at 2:25 pm to Lancearmstrong100
Alabama has three guys out for likely the same thing. FWIW.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 2:28 pm to Lancearmstrong100
Is this alter's schtick being completely new to college football? Every program uses stuff like this. Some people just slip up and get caught.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 2:29 pm to Lancearmstrong100
As long as a 10 man committee decides who gets to play for a Championship, there should alway have an asterisk next to the winner.
This post was edited on 1/6/19 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 1/6/19 at 2:29 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Alabama has three guys out for likely the same thing. FWIW.
Those three just overdid the deer antler spray
Posted on 1/6/19 at 2:40 pm to Lancearmstrong100
Does this happen in any other team sport?
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:20 pm to Lancearmstrong100
Cock alter
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:22 pm to Irons Puppet
So computers couldn't do it now a 10 man committee can't do it.
What would make you happy, Puppy?
Do you want the keys to the car? Hopefully you'll work really hard to change the system so you can be happy.
What would make you happy, Puppy?
Do you want the keys to the car? Hopefully you'll work really hard to change the system so you can be happy.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:33 pm to teamjackson
Puppet is just another jealous awbarn fan, that says shite that,to make himself feel better about the Dynasty that BAMA is the middle of.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:36 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
labama has three guys out for likely the same thing. FWIW.
Not the same thing Brown’s is likely pot
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:41 pm to Lancearmstrong100
When Clemson beats Bama their title will be even more celebrated because they did it without one of their best players
Posted on 1/6/19 at 3:43 pm to Bama54
quote:
Not the same thing Brown’s is likely pot
They just need to get rid of this rule. It's as if literally nobody in the NCAA/conference leadership has ever smoked pot and everything they know about it stems from 1930s propaganda movies. Pot is in no way a performance enhancer. Hell, enough use and it will hurt long-term performance. I could see the problem if players were popping PCP in pre-game warm-ups, but pot? You're just punishing players for lowering their ability to perform, be aggressive, and not lie on the turf laughing every time someone uses "inside route" and "wide receivers" in the same sentence.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 4:59 pm to Lancearmstrong100
I hope they win on an illegal pick play
Posted on 1/6/19 at 5:00 pm to randomways
quote:
Pot is in no way a performance enhancer. Hell, enough use and it will hurt long-term performance
This board is proof.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 5:03 pm to teamjackson
quote:
So computers couldn't do it now a 10 man committee can't do it.
What would make you happy, Puppy?
At least you had a large sample size who made the decision. Now it is a few of fired ex-coaches and a token reporter and a few administrators. It is an invitational tournament and nothing else.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 5:31 pm to Bama54
quote:
Not the same thing Brown’s is likely pot
Maybe. Maybe not. We don’t know because Alabama didn’t make a stir about it like Clemson.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News