re: Adam Anderson's attorney asks Georgia to reconsider suspension

quote:

---

can’t say she recanted as both may be accurate.

---

That’s impossible.

There’s a HUGE flaw in the first story because while she can wake up at 7am and surely know some kind of intercourse happened, if she’s totally unconscious throughout said intercourse she can’t possibly identify exactly who did it to her. She can only make an assumption.

Which is very likely why she changed the story. Which then destroys credibility and sure makes it seem like she started the whole thing off with a lie to try and explain away why she didn’t fight back, scream, and why she apparently stayed until at least 7am.

We know AA has admitted to having sex with her now, but she clearly didn’t know he was going to do that when she was giving her statements. So being totally unconscious and his DNA being in her is no longer a factor. But her lying makes it seem like this is the angle she was going for… until the cops or her attorney told her it’s impossible to actually identify who raped her if she was really totally unconscious.

I imagine that was a “Oh frick, I didn’t think about that.” moment for her. Hence the story change.

But now, with the story change that she “woke up during” and this is how she can for sure identify AA, a whole new set of holes appear. Like why stay, why no defensive/offensive wounds, why no screaming, etc. etc.

Credibility shot and unreasonable holes… and this is very likely why no arrest so far. Could change, obviously as this is all speculation based on logical deduction, but this is certainly the most plausible rationale thus far from what we do know.