Started By
Message

re: As The Red Beans Boil: Formal request for Coach O to testify at April 8 hearing

Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:14 pm to
Posted by BLG
Georgia
Member since Mar 2018
7169 posts
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:14 pm to
quote:


He says he didnt. That's evidence.


Are you truly that clueless? Anybody can make a claim but evidence requires a burden of proof.

The boyfriend of one of the girls that was raped says Orgeron told him all girlfriends sleep around. The 74 year old lady says she personally told Orgeron about the sexual harassment. First Orgeron said he never talked to her and now he says he doesn't remember. So what happened to the "evidence" of his claim he never talked to her?
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93940 posts
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Anybody can make a claim but evidence requires a burden of proof.

This goes directly against what you're saying. Other people are making they claims. They are the one with the burden of proof, not Orgeron.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
53418 posts
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

Are you truly that clueless? Anybody can make a claim but evidence requires a burden of proof


Um, false.

Evidence can literally be anything.

quote:

The boyfriend of one of the girls that was raped says Orgeron told him all girlfriends sleep around


Irrelevant.

quote:

The 74 year old lady says she personally told Orgeron about the sexual harassment. First Orgeron said he never talked to her and now he says he doesn't remember. So what happened to the "evidence" of his claim he never talked to her?


You're moving goalposts and changing the subject now.

We were talking about evidence in the other cases, not the security guard issue.
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 4/1/21 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Anybody can make a claim but evidence requires a burden of proof.


Yes.

quote:

So what happened to the "evidence" of his claim he never talked to her?



Where is the evidence that he *did* talk to her?

You can't prove a negative but if you can prove that he did talk to her, you might have something. So far, we have the testimony of grandma and her granddaughter. That's all we have. Nobody else is talking and the evidence she purported got torched by a pot of red beans. Need phone logs, something, anything.

That's why this Senate committee wants to talk to Ed. Because they are *desperate* for any more evidence.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter