Started By
Message

re: UGA Pass Defense isn't as Good as Advertised

Posted on 12/6/19 at 11:26 am to
Posted by bayou85
Concordia
Member since Sep 2016
8706 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 11:26 am to
quote:

76% of their passing average


Calling BS on that. Stats can be deceiving.

aTm had 275 on UGA vs 247 average.
AU is 245 vs a 210 average
UT is 273 vs a 220 average
ND is 275 vs a 250 average

Murray State had 261 vs a 237 average.


That state is highly flawed.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22815 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Calling BS on that. Stats can be deceiving. aTm had 275 on UGA vs 247 average. AU is 245 vs a 210 average UT is 273 vs a 220 average ND is 275 vs a 250 average Murray State had 261 vs a 237 average.


ATM -1 rushing yards
UT 70 rush yards
ND 46 rush yards
AU 84 rush yards
Murray State 23 rush yards

Pretty sure I know why those teams threw the ball so much..

LSU gives up more passing and rushing, even if you take away our best games.
Posted by atlanta917
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2017
5692 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 11:34 am to
quote:

aTm had 275 on UGA vs 247 average. AU is 245 vs a 210 average UT is 273 vs a 220 average ND is 275 vs a 250 average

You realize the season is longer than 4 games right?
quote:

Murray State

Fcs schools aren’t included. Doesn’t make sense to put in a team’s production against an FCS school.
quote:

Calling BS on that. Stats can be deceiving.

You’d be wrong then. Stats are deceiving with a short sample size. This a full seasons worth of sample size.
This post was edited on 12/6/19 at 11:36 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter