Started By
Message

re: Why do we not have an OC?

Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:06 am to
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68829 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:06 am to
In Freeze's defense, Bjork was not willing to put up close to this much money for assistants as he is with Luke. He knows Luke is his final stand and if he fails, then he is out as well. Money is what got MM and Rich Rod here. Not some great persuasion by Luke.
Posted by 256Rebel
Member since Dec 2017
402 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 8:55 am to
The one "advantage" Ole Miss has with Luke as HC, is that he is not being paid as much as Freeze was being paid. So you could make the argument that Bjork can afford to pay more for coordinators than he could before. I'm probably grasping at straws here, but I do agree with Dores in that the hiring during the Luke regime, whoever is responsible for it, has not been bad.

Maybe now, with RR running the offense, we'll see a system that can cut down on the 3-and-outs, and that improves red zone scoring. In the same vein, I'm hoping to see a defense that is at least decently-coached, with MM at the helm.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

In Freeze's defense, Bjork was not willing to put up close to this much money for assistants as he is with Luke.
Wait, what? Freeze literally gave Wesley fricking McGriff 3 years 1.1m. That's more than Rich Rod is making.

You think we hired shite coordinators because of money? Please. We hired shite coordinators because that's all we could get to come here.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter