Started By
Message

re: How did Mizzou get the upper hand on Auburn?

Posted on 12/6/18 at 6:25 pm to
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25248 posts
Posted on 12/6/18 at 6:25 pm to
While the urge to kick Auburn while they are down is always strong the truth is Bryant picked Missouri over Auburn for the same reason he picked Missouri over Arkansas.

Auburn and Arkansas (and I suspect most of the schools on his transfer list) are missing more then just a QB to have a quality offense. Mizzou has everything in place, seemingly, but a QB.

Bryant has a year left to play. A team going through a rebuild of its offense isn't where he'd want to land. Arkansas, for example, has a ton of WR and TE talent coming in next year. Which does him no good because it will take most of the season, at least, for them to get up to game speed.

He can walk into the Missouri job and have a functional offense from day one. Not to mention Missouri's schedule is back loaded so he can put up monster numbers at the beginning of the year to get the attention of pro scouts.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19271 posts
Posted on 12/6/18 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

While the urge to kick Auburn while they are down is always strong the truth is Bryant picked Missouri over Auburn for the same reason he picked Missouri over Arkansas.

Auburn and Arkansas (and I suspect most of the schools on his transfer list) are missing more then just a QB to have a quality offense. Mizzou has everything in place, seemingly, but a QB.

Bryant has a year left to play. A team going through a rebuild of its offense isn't where he'd want to land. Arkansas, for example, has a ton of WR and TE talent coming in next year. Which does him no good because it will take most of the season, at least, for them to get up to game speed.

He can walk into the Missouri job and have a functional offense from day one. Not to mention Missouri's schedule is back loaded so he can put up monster numbers at the beginning of the year to get the attention of pro scouts.


Plus for all the grief Derek Dooley gets for being a failure in Tennessee, he time with the Dallas Cowboys prepared him for his job as Missouri OC. Drew Lock openly admits Dooley helped him make strides this year to possibly become a Top 10 pick.

So even if there were Auburn bagmen it's small potatoes compared to an NFL contract.
Posted by AlaCowboy
North Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
6952 posts
Posted on 12/6/18 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

he can put up monster numbers at the beginning of the year to get the attention of pro scouts.


Those early numbers would only mean the scouts would want to see, at the combine, if he is better than his overall record indicates.
Posted by Tigerfan0318
Missouri
Member since Oct 2018
1693 posts
Posted on 12/6/18 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

While the urge to kick Auburn while they are down is always strong the truth is Bryant picked Missouri over Auburn for the same reason he picked Missouri over Arkansas.

Auburn and Arkansas (and I suspect most of the schools on his transfer list) are missing more then just a QB to have a quality offense. Mizzou has everything in place, seemingly, but a QB.

Bryant has a year left to play. A team going through a rebuild of its offense isn't where he'd want to land. Arkansas, for example, has a ton of WR and TE talent coming in next year. Which does him no good because it will take most of the season, at least, for them to get up to game speed.

He can walk into the Missouri job and have a functional offense from day one. Not to mention Missouri's schedule is back loaded so he can put up monster numbers at the beginning of the year to get the attention of pro scouts


After all these rants, what the Hog says here is the bottom line truth. Thanks for bringing "reason" to this thread.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter