Started By
Message
Do you accept the notion of the Big Bang as the origin of our universe?
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 1/4/18 at 9:59 pm
I didn’t know this board existed and was invited here, this thread drifted far from the original topic in the OT lounge. What does this board think?
That the universe from everything we can tell originated from an infinitely dense singularity and experienced an extrodinarily rapid inflation resulting in the universe we see today?
American astronomer Edwin Hubble observed that the distances to faraway galaxies were strongly correlated with their redshifts. This was interpreted to mean that all distant galaxies and clusters are receding away from our vantage point with an apparent velocity proportional to their distance: that is, the farther they are, the faster they move away from us, regardless of direction.[13] Assuming the Copernican principle (that the Earth is not the center of the universe), the only remaining interpretation is that all observable regions of the universe are receding from all others. Since we know that the distance between galaxies increases today, it must mean that in the past galaxies were closer together. The continuous expansion of the universe implies that the universe was denser and hotter in the past.
LINK
The earliest and most direct observational evidence of the validity of the theory are the expansion of the universe according to Hubble's law (as indicated by the redshifts of galaxies), discovery and measurement of the cosmic microwave background and the relative abundances of light elements produced by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. More recent evidence includes observations of galaxy formation and evolution, and the distribution of large-scale cosmic structures,[69] These are sometimes called the "four pillars" of the Big Bang theory.[70]
That the universe from everything we can tell originated from an infinitely dense singularity and experienced an extrodinarily rapid inflation resulting in the universe we see today?

American astronomer Edwin Hubble observed that the distances to faraway galaxies were strongly correlated with their redshifts. This was interpreted to mean that all distant galaxies and clusters are receding away from our vantage point with an apparent velocity proportional to their distance: that is, the farther they are, the faster they move away from us, regardless of direction.[13] Assuming the Copernican principle (that the Earth is not the center of the universe), the only remaining interpretation is that all observable regions of the universe are receding from all others. Since we know that the distance between galaxies increases today, it must mean that in the past galaxies were closer together. The continuous expansion of the universe implies that the universe was denser and hotter in the past.
LINK
The earliest and most direct observational evidence of the validity of the theory are the expansion of the universe according to Hubble's law (as indicated by the redshifts of galaxies), discovery and measurement of the cosmic microwave background and the relative abundances of light elements produced by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. More recent evidence includes observations of galaxy formation and evolution, and the distribution of large-scale cosmic structures,[69] These are sometimes called the "four pillars" of the Big Bang theory.[70]
This post was edited on 1/4/18 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 1/4/18 at 10:08 pm to DavidTheGnome
I believe in it but am not nearly intelligent enough to discuss it at your level. Paging Kentucker.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 10:39 pm to pvilleguru
Posted on 1/4/18 at 10:49 pm to DavidTheGnome
God will send them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie
Posted on 1/4/18 at 10:57 pm to DavidTheGnome
Takes more faith to believe that it all happened by chance than to believe that an Intelligent Designer created everything.
Posted on 1/4/18 at 11:34 pm to DavidTheGnome
There are about 5 theories about the origin of the Universe but the Big Bang is the strongest by far. In recent years lots of evidence has accumulated to bolster this strong theory. From Alan Guth’s Inflation Theory to the discovery of gravity waves, evidence that the Big Bang happened is mounting.
The newest challenge to the Big Bang Theory is the Big Bulk Theory , or the Cyclic Universe Theory. It proposes a recycling of the Universe via an expansion/contraction cycle. There’s a great YouTube video that’s easy to follow. I’ll try to find it and post it tomorrow.
I found your thread too late for lots of comments tonight, but I’m awfully glad you found the SEC OT.
The newest challenge to the Big Bang Theory is the Big Bulk Theory , or the Cyclic Universe Theory. It proposes a recycling of the Universe via an expansion/contraction cycle. There’s a great YouTube video that’s easy to follow. I’ll try to find it and post it tomorrow.
I found your thread too late for lots of comments tonight, but I’m awfully glad you found the SEC OT.
This post was edited on 1/4/18 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 1/4/18 at 11:42 pm to Kentucker
How can there be contraction if the universe is accelerating in its expansion?
Posted on 1/5/18 at 12:02 am to DavidTheGnome
Weird things seem to happen with gravity as matter and energy expand into space. For example, about 5-6 billion years ago, repulsive dark energy overcame the attractive quality of gravity and the pace of expansion into space dramatically increased.
At least this is the idea for explaining dark energy’s effects as we see them today. It could very well be that gravity changed in some way from an attractive effect to a repulsive one.
Neil Turok and other scientists think that gravity will change again in the distant future. It will once again become attractive and start a contraction of the Universe.
ETA: I’m running on fumes and have to sleep but I hope we and others can take up this subject with you again tomorrow.
At least this is the idea for explaining dark energy’s effects as we see them today. It could very well be that gravity changed in some way from an attractive effect to a repulsive one.
Neil Turok and other scientists think that gravity will change again in the distant future. It will once again become attractive and start a contraction of the Universe.
ETA: I’m running on fumes and have to sleep but I hope we and others can take up this subject with you again tomorrow.
This post was edited on 1/5/18 at 12:13 am
Posted on 1/5/18 at 5:01 am to DavidTheGnome
Big Bang is a theory. Not fact. It is science's best guess as to the origin of the universe.
Posted on 1/5/18 at 6:26 am to Hogwarts
quote:
Takes more faith to believe that it all happened by chance than to believe that God created everything.
Agree and I edited it a little
Posted on 1/5/18 at 8:05 am to DavidTheGnome
Honestly, IDGAF how the universe came to be. Ain't changing anything about my day to day 

Posted on 1/5/18 at 8:48 am to DavidTheGnome
To be honest, Im not smart enough for this discussion and dont give a frick. it happened long before me and will be happening for billions of years after me.
Posted on 1/5/18 at 9:17 am to Perfect Circle
quote:
Big Bang is a theory. Not fact. It is science's best guess as to the origin of the universe.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.
That is a copy and paste right from an online dictionary.
Scientific theories are not the sort of the theory you are thinking of. They become theories after being tested over and over again, while producing the same result.
Scientific terminology is a bit different from every day terminology. At first it can be a bit confusing yes, but the more you study science the easier it is to understand why they call things the way they do.
Evolution, gravity, the big bang, light, thermodynamics... all of these things are presented as scientific theories because they are accepted within the scientific community after they have survived rigorous testing.
Posted on 1/5/18 at 10:28 am to Perfect Circle
quote:
Big Bang is a theory. Not fact. It is science's best guess as to the origin of the universe.
“Fact” is a layman’s term that is most relevant to legal matters. Evidence is the nearest equivalent that’s used in science.
As Arksulli said, Theory (with a capital T) is not a guess. It’s a well-studied system of ideas that is sustained by evidence.
Posted on 1/5/18 at 10:32 am to DavidTheGnome
Looks like God started cooking some Jiffy Pop about 14 billion years ago, which may be just a few minutes in celestial time.
Posted on 1/5/18 at 10:35 am to Hogwarts
quote:
Takes more faith to believe that it all happened by chance than to believe that an Intelligent Designer created everything.
Faith is not relevant to science. Religion is not relevant to science. Science explores the “how” of the origin of existence. It is left to religion and philosophy to study the “why.”
Posted on 1/5/18 at 10:40 am to Jazzbo Depew
quote:
Bernadette is hot !
Even when she does her impression of Mrs. Wolowitz?

Back to top
