Started By
Message
If you had mulligans, how many of the players would you take again?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 9/17/17 at 9:53 pm
Crockett
Simms
Adams
Howell
Pendleton
Beckner
Fatoney
Garrett - Though I'd hope he's not a starter
I truly think I'd take a risk with every other player that the player brought in instead would be better. Reese and Blanton might be able to be added to that list.
Who would you absolutely bring back and not take a chance with a mulligan? Anyone? And forget the obvious like BO. Just trying to get a gauge of what kind of talent might actually be on the team.
Simms
Adams
Howell
Pendleton
Beckner
Fatoney
Garrett - Though I'd hope he's not a starter
I truly think I'd take a risk with every other player that the player brought in instead would be better. Reese and Blanton might be able to be added to that list.
Who would you absolutely bring back and not take a chance with a mulligan? Anyone? And forget the obvious like BO. Just trying to get a gauge of what kind of talent might actually be on the team.
6
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:32 pm to reedus23
No linebackers
Sherrils looked like he still cared if they won or lost when no one else on the defense did, so maybe him.
Sherrils looked like he still cared if they won or lost when no one else on the defense did, so maybe him.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 10:46 pm to reedus23
Well Crockett and the freshman all american for sure.
I like Garrett's effort I'd take him off the bench. and he's still young.
I like Garrett's effort I'd take him off the bench. and he's still young.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 7:54 am to reedus23
I think there's more than that. Remember the GP model for success. Redshirt year 1, special teams snaps year 2, part time player year 3, starter level player in years 4-5.
There's just not many players now that were allowed to go that route.
I would add Brandon and Whiteside to players I would keep. I also would like to see more of Byers, Turner, Williams, Anderson, Brooks, Miller and Bledsoe before writing them off.
On offense I would take Hall, Johnson, Floyd, Mason, Albert O and Rountree. Teach receivers to actually run routes and they could be really good.
There's just not many players now that were allowed to go that route.
I would add Brandon and Whiteside to players I would keep. I also would like to see more of Byers, Turner, Williams, Anderson, Brooks, Miller and Bledsoe before writing them off.
On offense I would take Hall, Johnson, Floyd, Mason, Albert O and Rountree. Teach receivers to actually run routes and they could be really good.
Posted on 9/19/17 at 6:49 am to reedus23
I'd rather get mulligans on the 11 5.7/5.8 rated players from the 2013-2015 classes that left before their eligibility expired.
Posted on 9/19/17 at 10:29 am to reedus23
The Mizzou "Second Stringers", no longer the Tigers.
Who is a difference makers on D? TBJ...okay. Then a handful of so-so's that should be second string at best. Then the remaining waste (LBs) that we took from lower divisions.
Besides TEs and Crockett, the rest of our O should be playing second string at best.
STs - Fatoney.
Coaches - take Elerbee...that is it. They're a bunch of second stringers that attract second stringers.
Who is a difference makers on D? TBJ...okay. Then a handful of so-so's that should be second string at best. Then the remaining waste (LBs) that we took from lower divisions.
Besides TEs and Crockett, the rest of our O should be playing second string at best.
STs - Fatoney.
Coaches - take Elerbee...that is it. They're a bunch of second stringers that attract second stringers.
This post was edited on 9/19/17 at 10:31 am
Posted on 9/19/17 at 10:59 am to reedus23
I can't believe that all our players are horrible athletes. We may not have any future NFL guys, but I think the main problem is that they don't know what the frick to do. Which stands to reason because their coaches don't know what the frick to do.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News