Started By
Message

re: Just how bad is the denial?

Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:31 am to
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Auburn got a pretty thorough colonoscopy by the NCAA and they found nothing. I think yalls theory is wrong.

Two big differences. One, had Cam's father rattedd on him the way Tunsils step father did, y'all would have been hammered.

Secondly there was no immunity given to the state snitch in yalls investigation. Anyone seeing a trend here? Had the state snitch in our investigation not been given immunity we would have only received the one NOA and would have lost 11 scholarships only because a players family member snitched
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 9:32 am
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
6780 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:33 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 9:34 am
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Two big differences. One, had Cam's father rattedd on him the way Tunsils step father did, y'all would have been hammered.

Secondly there was no immunity given to the state snitch in yalls investigation. Anyone seeing a trend here? Had the state snitch in our investigation not been given immunity we would have only received the one NOA and would have lost 11 scholarships only because a players family member snitched



one big thing, the comment he replied to said that having investigators on campus for any length they were bound to find something. Your retorts mean nothing in this sense

quote:

Had the state snitch in our investigation not been given immunity we would have only received the one NOA and would have lost 11 scholarships only because a players family member snitched
its funny that this is your reality
Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Secondly there was no immunity given to the state snitch in yalls investigation. Anyone seeing a trend here? Had the state snitch in our investigation not been given immunity we would have only received the one NOA and would have lost 11 scholarships only because a players family member snitched


Just as a reminder: You are using the word "snitch" to mean "provide honest information about Ole Miss violating NCAA rules".

...lest we lose sight of what's important here...
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30273 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Two big differences. One, had Cam's father rattedd on him the way Tunsils step father did, y'all would have been hammered.

Secondly there was no immunity given to the state snitch in yalls investigation. Anyone seeing a trend here? Had the state snitch in our investigation not been given immunity we would have only received the one NOA and would have lost 11 scholarships only because a players family member snitched



Come on man, the NCAA found half a dozen more Level 1's during the 2nd investigation, Leo Lewis was only one of those. And if your Administration, including your coaching staff hadn't carried on working their deals while y'all were under investigation then there would have been no need to send the NOA because OM would have been clean.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter