You will be hard pressed to find anything negative said about Akers from 99 out of 100 state fans. Him not having as good a game as Hill in the AllStar game is absolutely true, however.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hailstate8

Member since Aug 2014

286 posts

Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:44 am to tOGLettuce

You sure seem salty about him too. Akers is definitely the better prospect and has a way higher ceiling. No one is denying that. But if I had to pick one to play in a college game next year it would be Hill. Cam has at least 1 year of adjusting to do before he is ready to play rb. His blocking was not good and he hesitated to hit the holes because he isn't used to taking handoffs and just going. You sure seem obsessed with the kid for someone who isn't in the picture for him and isn't in the state he plays in.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by darth bamaguy

Member since Aug 2015

20 posts

Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:33 am to tOGLettuce

The fact is that you guys(not all) clearly talk down on that kid and everyone across the southeast sees it. Doesn't matter where I'm from. I also never said Hill didn't have a better game because he did. Who wants to address the fact that he got some yards because of the attention to Akers? They both are great but I believe in giving credit where credit is due. I even saw a comment somewhere from a State fan that said Hill would be a better prospect because of his build. lololol. I hope both of them excel but it's crazy to see people in MS do that kid like that.