Started By
Message
Barners, Saban Beat Clemson by, in essence, putting a box on Watson.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:29 pm
Can, y'all do the same?
Also I have noticed the line is tilting to Auburn's favor. Clemson -7 1/2 right now. I know Taters will bet on anything orange. I think the line will be Clemson -6 1/2 or -7 come September 3.
Two question, one I have asked before. Can y'all win, thought I would ask this after a couple weeks of practice.
Can you cover?
Also I have noticed the line is tilting to Auburn's favor. Clemson -7 1/2 right now. I know Taters will bet on anything orange. I think the line will be Clemson -6 1/2 or -7 come September 3.
Two question, one I have asked before. Can y'all win, thought I would ask this after a couple weeks of practice.
Can you cover?
This post was edited on 8/11/16 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:30 pm to CocknDawg
Oh boy.
Unwritten rule of the rant broken
You might catch some shite
Unwritten rule of the rant broken
You might catch some shite
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:31 pm to CNB
Won't be the first time. And I am wanting to wager a little on Auburn.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:38 pm to CocknDawg
quote:
Can you cover?
The real issues will be our LBs ability to tackle Watson in open space. We have two thumper LBs which causes me some concern on that front.
Clemson has some extremely gifted WRs but our CBs match up extremely well against them when combined with our DL.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:39 pm to CocknDawg
quote:
Barners,
quote:no
Can, y'all do the same?
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:40 pm to CocknDawg
Steele is going to frick Watson's arse and make him humble
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:43 pm to CocknDawg
quote:
Can y'all win
I think AU will be better this year than some think - particularly if the QB play is average to good, but I think it's a tall ask to think they beat a team that talented early in the season while AU is still trying to find their QB and trying to find themselves on D.
quote:
Can you cover?
No.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:44 pm to CocknDawg
quote:
Barners, Saban Beat Clemson by, in essence, putting a box on Watson.
Um, no we didn't.
Bama beat Clemson because (a) Clemson forgot that the tight end is an eligible receiver and (b) Bama has a really fast tight end.
Watson, on the other hand, lit us up like a 4th of July fireworks show.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:45 pm to GenesChin
Carlton is legit, but the rest of the secondary is a tad suspect
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:47 pm to CocknDawg
Deshaun Watson vs. a Kevin Steele defense is going to be a shite show. Any possible threat from Auburn's DL will be negated by Watson's legs.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:51 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
Watson, on the other hand, lit us up like a 4th of July fireworks show.
I understand about the TE and you are, of course, right.
But Saban kept running in fresh tackles, ends and backers the whole night. And Watson was hurried. Damn, y'all had at least 12 four-star and above defensive linemen.
But Watson will probably be the first pick in the 2017 draft.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:51 pm to CocknDawg
Well it didn't work. Watson worked our defense over. He is legit.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:52 pm to CNB
quote:
Oh boy.
Unwritten rule of the rant broken
You might catch some shite
Unwritten rant rule? Three commas in a thread title?
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:54 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
Steele is going to frick Watson's arse and make him humble
In some parts of the country, they call Steele "Saban Jr."
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:57 pm to Sid E Walker
quote:
Unwritten rant rule? Three commas in a thread title?
Posted on 8/11/16 at 4:57 pm to beatbammer
quote:
In some parts of the country, they call Steele "Saban Jr."
In some parts of what country? Certainly not in America.
Posted on 8/11/16 at 5:13 pm to GregAl
quote:is this what we want football to be
Also by out scoring them
Posted on 8/11/16 at 5:34 pm to CocknDawg
This post was edited on 8/11/16 at 5:35 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News