Started By
Message
Lsu/wisc or bama/usc
Posted on 8/7/16 at 9:57 am
Posted on 8/7/16 at 9:57 am
Which game do you think will be the better game? I'm actually excited to see Bama and USCw play each other, eventhough it would be a lot better if USC was what they use to be. But they are still two of the most dominant programs of the past decade. I'll say Bama by 14 and the LSU / Wisc game will be more competitive, esp since we got Aranda from them. Going to be a physical game!
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:00 am to lsufreak337
I think both win by 17 or more so neither.
Edit: I will enjoy the LSU game more because it's at Lambeau.
Edit: I will enjoy the LSU game more because it's at Lambeau.
This post was edited on 8/7/16 at 10:02 am
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:00 am to lsufreak337
Neither. Both will be double digit wins.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:02 am to lsufreak337
Actually sc hasn't been a dominate program in a decade.
2005 was a long time ago and they've seen Oregon and Stanford surpass them with ucla quickly becoming equals.
Wisconsin has been on a steep decline the past 3 seasons, lsu on a steady decline for 4 years, neither game should be close, both are only intriguing based on the logos on he helmets and locations of the games.
2005 was a long time ago and they've seen Oregon and Stanford surpass them with ucla quickly becoming equals.
Wisconsin has been on a steep decline the past 3 seasons, lsu on a steady decline for 4 years, neither game should be close, both are only intriguing based on the logos on he helmets and locations of the games.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:03 am to lsufreak337
Bama uscw will be exciting for the 1st quarter, LSU Wisc will be for the 4th.
If I had to pick it'd be bama uscw.
If I had to pick it'd be bama uscw.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:06 am to lsufreak337
I'd guess Wisconsin has a better shot at beating LSU than USC does of beating Bama so the LSU/Wisky game should be the better one
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:14 am to lsufreak337
Bama & LSU should take care of both cupcakes....
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:16 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Actually sc hasn't been a dominate program in a decade.
Thats why I said the past decade...meaning 2000-2010. You cannot deny how good USC was during the Pete Carrol era.
And idc how many points they win by. Both games could be won by 2 tds and one could still be a better more exciting game than the other...
This post was edited on 8/7/16 at 10:19 am
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:24 am to johnzorback
[quote]Bama uscw will be exciting for the 1st quarter, LSU Wisc will be for the 4th
I can def see that happening
I can def see that happening
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:25 am to lsufreak337
USC has more potential to sneak up on us I think.
LSU will just pummel Wisconsin the whole game and eventually they'll break. That kinda happened last year when we played them. By the 2nd half they were worn down by our physicality and we just steam rolled them.
LSU will just pummel Wisconsin the whole game and eventually they'll break. That kinda happened last year when we played them. By the 2nd half they were worn down by our physicality and we just steam rolled them.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:30 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Actually sc hasn't been a dominate program in a decade.
They went 11-2, 11-2, and 12-1 from 06-08 and won 3 straight Rose Bowls.
08 was probably their best team when they had Sanchez, Clay Mathews, Taylor Mays, Nick Perry, Brian Cushing, Tyron Smith, and Rey Maualuga. I'm sure I missed a few, but that '08 team was one of the best teams to not win the title. They beat Ohio State (finished 10-3) that year 35-3 and was up 31-7 at halftime vs a good Penn State squad in the Rose Bowl.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:34 am to Gary Busey
Each yeah they choked away an easy path to the mnc game, that is something dominant teams do not do.
They had great seasons, but may other teams had equally great seasons in that time frame that were still less than two other teams each year.
Since that time they have been hit with sanctions, Kiffin, and sark which has steadily moved their program close to being pre-Carroll again.
They had great seasons, but may other teams had equally great seasons in that time frame that were still less than two other teams each year.
Since that time they have been hit with sanctions, Kiffin, and sark which has steadily moved their program close to being pre-Carroll again.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:38 am to DaleDenton
I guess it depends on your definition of dominant. They have sucked since 09, and even in Kiffin's one good year, they weren't bowl eligible. 3 straight Rose Bowls and beating top 25 opponents like a ragdoll is dominating to me though. What they did was impressive.
This post was edited on 8/7/16 at 10:39 am
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:38 am to lsufreak337
I honestly think USC/Bama will be a 4 quarter game. USC may not be as deep as Bama but they definitely have some elite playmakers like JuJu, Adoree, Iman Marshall, & Brown (All 5*s) who all could start anywhere in the country. Im looking forward to the Adoree Jackson/Calvin Ridley matchup. Jackson said he wants to shadow Ridley all game.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:42 am to TigerFanFromBama
Think it depends on how the QB's for Bama play. If it's similar to how Coker played last year vs Wisconsin, I think Bama wins by a fairly big margin and will pull away by mid-3rd quarter.
I don't see LSU-Wisconsin being a game at all, unless LSU has a few breakdowns in special teams.
I don't see LSU-Wisconsin being a game at all, unless LSU has a few breakdowns in special teams.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:46 am to TigerFanFromBama
I honestly hope the bama / usc game comes down to the 4th quarter. Should be an exciting game with both teams having playmakers across the board.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:48 am to brlsu1988
uh, what?? Bama might win, but it will be no blowout..You give me USC+17 and ill put any amount of money you want to on it.
Kessler and adoree jackson play for usc correct?
Kessler and adoree jackson play for usc correct?
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:51 am to Hook Em Horns
Kessler, no. Adoree Jackson does though.
This post was edited on 8/7/16 at 10:54 am
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:52 am to lsufreak337
LSU should beat the shite out of Wisconsin so I'll go with Bama and USC. The Trojans have a talented roster but just can't get it together for some reason. Bama might struggle in game 1 with a new QB which might make the game close. I doubt it but it could happen so I'll go with that game.
Posted on 8/7/16 at 10:56 am to Hook Em Horns
LSU will hammer Wisconsin. 17+. The only reason it won't be worse is Les doesn't like to embarrass other teams. Both Fournette and Guice hit the century mark, with LF north of 150.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News