Started By
Message

Did OM only offer 84 Scholarships this past year?
Posted on 5/28/16 at 4:47 am
Posted on 5/28/16 at 4:47 am
They claim a reduction to 84 for 2015 is part of their penalties. Guess they planned on these self imposed penalties for a good long while since that was locked in stone August 2015.
Finally saw the breakdown. 84 total last year, 83 this upcoming season, 81 for 2017 and 2018 and then back to 85 in 2019. Initial signees down to 22 for next 3 classes
Being at 81 OM can afford a few less initial counters than 22 as well, so they have some wiggle room built in for the NCAA to add there. They probably wouldn't be able to enroll 22 in 2018 for instance
Finally saw the breakdown. 84 total last year, 83 this upcoming season, 81 for 2017 and 2018 and then back to 85 in 2019. Initial signees down to 22 for next 3 classes
Being at 81 OM can afford a few less initial counters than 22 as well, so they have some wiggle room built in for the NCAA to add there. They probably wouldn't be able to enroll 22 in 2018 for instance
Posted on 5/28/16 at 4:56 am to Blawdawg
I don't know but their self imposed penalties are a crock of shite. USCw got a lot more for doing less.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 6:24 am to offshoretrash
quote:
I don't know but their self imposed penalties are a crock of shite. USCw got a lot more for doing less.
The total value of the inducements the NCAA is alleging over 5 years is less than the one used Mustang that State admitted to.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 6:29 am to offshoretrash
Yeah cant help but hope the ncaa spreads that OM arse aggy style
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:25 am to Shakita Bonita
quote:
Yeah cant help but hope the ncaa spreads that OM arse aggy style
One can only hope.

Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:27 am to Shakita Bonita
quote:
Yeah cant help but hope the ncaa spreads that OM arse aggy style
I'm not into gay rape fantasies like you are, but I'm a fairly progressive guy. So I'm not looking down on you or anything
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:42 am to No Colors
quote:
'm not into gay rape fantasies like you are, but I'm a fairly progressive guy. So I'm not looking down on you or anything
Liar.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:47 am to LovetheLord
quote:
Liar
The closest I get to gay porn is watching video of our line gang raping your quarterback the last couple of years. If I'm feeling really hard core, I isolate Marquis Haynes during the LSU game.
If that counts, I'm guilty.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:52 am to No Colors
Dude keep reaching. We fired a coach quick and reported said violation. In the meantime your pathetic institution got lawyered up and told the Ncaa to pound sand. Moron. You gonna get what you deserve. You are typical of an OM fan trying to divert attention while lying for your preacher and Bjork.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:53 am to No Colors
Implying it wouldn't be consensual. Kind of weird that you went straight for the rape fantasy.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:54 am to offshoretrash
quote:
offshoretrash
quote:
USCw got a lot more for doing less.
Wow, really? No wonder you are a menial offshore rough neck stuck doing a mindless job. It would be a shame for someone with 1/2 a mind to waste his life as such. However, I would suggest having someone read the report to you so you might be able to comprehend how utterly stupid you are.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 1:52 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
No wonder you are a menial offshore rough neck stuck doing a mindless job. It would be a shame for someone with 1/2 a mind to waste his life as such. However, I would suggest having someone read the report to you so you might be able to comprehend how utterly stupid you are.
So you are an internet tough guy that is making this personal.
Actually I am a Toolpusher, with 24yrs of experience. It's pretty funny when dumbasses say stupid shite like this. There is a reason why our jobs can't be filled with college boys, you can't be a soft pussy and do our job. I bet you wouldn't last a day as roughneck.
Ole Piss flat out cheated on kids test grades and paid players. How does that deserve less punishment than USCw?
Posted on 5/28/16 at 1:57 pm to offshoretrash
Don't feel slighted by the OM fan throwing insults. I'm pretty sure he works at a convenience store
Posted on 5/28/16 at 2:02 pm to offshoretrash
Not skilled enough to be a welder huh?
Posted on 5/28/16 at 2:04 pm to MaroonNation
Ole Miss fans these days.........
Or


Or

Posted on 5/28/16 at 2:06 pm to offshoretrash
You're full of shite. The two aren't even comparable. The worst violations occurred SIX years ago under a completely different athletics department and coaching staff. And the guy responsible already got a ten year show cause. You guys have your heads up your asses if you think it's going to be significantly worse than that. If any worse at all.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 3:22 pm to VivaZapata27
Technically speaking the Saunder's stuff isn't the absolute worst violation since they are of the same level as alleged violations of Harris and in the "failure to monitor" Tunsil's agent/booster/car situation.
If these were 3 separate infractions cases over 10 years OM might have been better off (although repeat offender would have been worse). The rules allow the NCAA to view the collection of violations as a pattern of infractions that rise to level 1 status. Also, technically the worst part of the case isn't the fraud, it is the volume.
OM's response claims penalties should be mitigated by 1) their discovering certain violations and doing such a thorough investigation, 2) Harris' multiple violations not being as bad as the NCAA says, and 3) that essentially that no penalty is warranted for the Tunsil situation since they had adequate structures in place to reasonably discover such violations, even though they didn't. The NCAA accuses them of not looking into Tunsil's cars and relationships thoroughly. That one actually sets up in a very interesting way for a precedent regarding what a school needs to do to investigate players with various loaner cars being parked in the practice lot.
If these were 3 separate infractions cases over 10 years OM might have been better off (although repeat offender would have been worse). The rules allow the NCAA to view the collection of violations as a pattern of infractions that rise to level 1 status. Also, technically the worst part of the case isn't the fraud, it is the volume.
OM's response claims penalties should be mitigated by 1) their discovering certain violations and doing such a thorough investigation, 2) Harris' multiple violations not being as bad as the NCAA says, and 3) that essentially that no penalty is warranted for the Tunsil situation since they had adequate structures in place to reasonably discover such violations, even though they didn't. The NCAA accuses them of not looking into Tunsil's cars and relationships thoroughly. That one actually sets up in a very interesting way for a precedent regarding what a school needs to do to investigate players with various loaner cars being parked in the practice lot.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 3:31 pm to Blawdawg
The pattern of abuse is what will nail their arse to the wall.
The NCAA will come back with, FTM..LOIC..and show cause for current and former coaches and AD staff. The hammer is going to drop HARD.
The NCAA will come back with, FTM..LOIC..and show cause for current and former coaches and AD staff. The hammer is going to drop HARD.
Posted on 5/28/16 at 3:37 pm to TideTurf
Actually there was no LOIC in this round.
Just failure to monitor RE Tunsil situation and other violations by individuals with no direct failures by the AD (Harris, Kiffin, Saunder's, Vaughn, Nix). The Tunsil one was the only one that brings the system into the discussion. Then again didn't we get hit with FTM with the textbooks? And there were no scholarship losses there.
With the new investigation, who knows? Tunsil was getting money from all over. Boosters, agents, stepdad, maybe even AD staff. That would ramp up that portion of the case
Just failure to monitor RE Tunsil situation and other violations by individuals with no direct failures by the AD (Harris, Kiffin, Saunder's, Vaughn, Nix). The Tunsil one was the only one that brings the system into the discussion. Then again didn't we get hit with FTM with the textbooks? And there were no scholarship losses there.
With the new investigation, who knows? Tunsil was getting money from all over. Boosters, agents, stepdad, maybe even AD staff. That would ramp up that portion of the case
Posted on 5/28/16 at 3:44 pm to VivaZapata27
.
This post was edited on 7/4/16 at 7:41 pm
Popular
Back to top
