Started By
Message

re: Why should the SEC East get an automatic berth in the conference title game?

Posted on 1/16/16 at 10:12 am to
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22780 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 10:12 am to
If this had been the setup since 1992, here are the differences, assuming h to h is first tiebreaker, no divisions:
93 - UF vs UT instead of Bama
95- UF vs UT instead of ARK
96 - UF vs UT instead of Bama
97- UF vs UT instead of Auburn
98 - UF vs UT instead of MSU
01- UF vs UT instead of LSU
10 - AU vs Ark instead of SC
11 - LSU vs Bama instead of UGA
13 - AU vs Bama instead of Mizzou

So overall SEC west would have many less appearances, UT many more.

Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33980 posts
Posted on 1/16/16 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

So overall SEC west would have many less appearances, UT many more.


And that would have been fine with me. Tennessee and Florida played in September every year during the '90s. How can a game played that early in the season be an accurate gauge of which team is better? Teams are often completely different from the start of the season than they are in late November, early December. If you remember the Phil Fulmer teams in the '90s, they always played much better later in the year than they did in September. Is it a mere coincidence that the one time Tennessee and Florida played each other late in the season (2001) when they were at the top of their game, Tennessee was able to win? If that game was played in early September, Florida would have won easily. So yes, Tennessee and Florida should have played in the SEC Championship Game multiple times during the '90s.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter