Started By
Message

re: 2003 USC vs 2012 Bama

Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:55 pm to
Posted by 5thTiger
Member since Nov 2014
7996 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

apparently Auburn was better than USC


Nope. '04 Auburn doesn't have the national title next to their name. Sucks they didn't get the chance, I would have liked to see the matchup.

In order to be in the "greatest" discussion

1. Undefeated
2. National Title

'04 Auburn falls to the same level as '12 Ohio State.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Nope. '04 Auburn doesn't have the national title next to their name. Sucks they didn't get the chance, I would have liked to see the matchup.

In order to be in the "greatest" discussion

1. Undefeated
2. National Title

'04 Auburn falls to the same level as '12 Ohio State.



Your logic is highly flawed. USC '04 simply was not that great, but keep those goal post on the move
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46650 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Auburn doesn't have the national title next to their name. 


As if getting VOTED into a game proves they are a better team.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter