Started By
Message
2003 USC vs 2012 Bama
Posted on 7/2/15 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 7/2/15 at 2:56 pm
Who wins and why?
Posted on 7/2/15 at 2:57 pm to The Silverback
Not sure,
But 2004 USC would have beat the brakes off of Auburn. It's a shame that game never happened.
But 2004 USC would have beat the brakes off of Auburn. It's a shame that game never happened.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 2:59 pm to The Silverback
Idk, probably bama. Their only loss was to a team that before the NCG coudl have made a legit claim to be one of the 10ish best football teams ever.
USC lost to an 8-6 team that went 5-3 in the pac 10.
USC lost to an 8-6 team that went 5-3 in the pac 10.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 2:59 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
A 04 match up between Auburn and SC would have been interesting, I've seen a lot of posters here claim auburn was the more talented bunch
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:01 pm to The Silverback
quote:
I've seen a lot of posters here claim auburn was the more talented bunch
yeah, the auburn fans.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:01 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
But 2004 USC would have beat the brakes off of Auburn
Kind of random. Not sure what auburn has to do with this thread.
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:02 pm to piggidyphish
quote:
Kind of random.
its a troll cast.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:02 pm to The Silverback
12 Alabama. I think they had a better offense.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:02 pm to Nguyening
I think the physicality of the Bama run game (the O line + Lacy) would shock USC. I doubt they saw an offensive front with that kind of power. For that matter, most college football teams have never seen a front like that, which Is why I favor them over teams from the 90s and before
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:03 pm to The Silverback
Is this the kind of stuff Bama fans sit around and think about in the offseason?
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:04 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
its a troll cast.
Just some bama and georgia fans getting together to talk about auburn.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:04 pm to The Silverback
quote:
A 04 match up between Auburn and SC would have been interesting, I've seen a lot of posters here claim auburn was the more talented bunch
They played the year prior and USC blanked 'em 23-0 in Auburn.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:05 pm to piggidyphish
quote:
Just some bama and georgia fans getting together to talk about auburn.
damn is it thursday already? Time flies!
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:05 pm to The Silverback
2003 USC. They crushed everybody other than their one hiccup game.
Shame the coaches had to vote the winner of the other game #1.
SC was clearly the best team that year.
Shame the coaches had to vote the winner of the other game #1.
SC was clearly the best team that year.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:07 pm to Forkbeard3777
quote:
They played the year prior and USC blanked 'em 23-0 in Auburn.
Didnt' bama blank auburn 49-0 in 2012? What happened the next year?
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:07 pm to Forkbeard3777
04 is a different season though. Bama blanked Ole Miss in 2013 and then we lost to them in '14
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:07 pm to Volmanac
ETA, too many topics
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:07 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
But 2004 USC would have beat the brakes off of Auburn. It's a shame that game never happened.
As much as I hate to admit it, I think Auburn would have beaten USC... That Auburn team was extremely talented and was SEC battle tested...
Posted on 7/2/15 at 3:10 pm to Volmanac
quote:
Shame the coaches had to vote the winner of the other game #1.
Shame the ap went rogue and went agianst the agreed upon arragnement.
Everyon agreed in 98 to abide by the BCS system. Whoever won the BCS CG between 1 and 2 was the national champ. That was LSU. Not USC. The AP was but a part of the BCS whole..no different than the harris poll or colley matrix. Starting in 04 it went from "doesn't count" to "literally means nothing".
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News