Started By
Message

re: We should let Auburn run to the East

Posted on 6/17/15 at 3:34 pm to
Posted by all4AU
Member since Oct 2009
499 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 3:34 pm to
Yes, that's why it'll likely never happen. You can put a check in the plus column for everything from an AU perspective. I don't see a way to make it work with the conference as a whole if you'd have to break up AU/Bama or UT/Bama.
This post was edited on 6/17/15 at 3:35 pm
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37713 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Yes, that's why it'll likely never happen. You can put a check in the plus column for everything from an AU perspective. I don't see a way to make it work with the conference as a whole if you'd have to break up AU/Bama or UT/Bama.


It will be interesting to see what happens. I don't want to lose either but the gripping from the rest of league may be too much in the end. AU gets everything they want....the rest of the league DGAF they just want more rotation of opponents...more frequent games with other SEC teams.
Posted by Roses of Crimson
Sweet home Ala-bam
Member since Nov 2014
1631 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 7:43 pm to
Auburn led for 60 some odd years because they didnt play.
They actually "led" for a fraction of that time.

I cant imagine not playing either. I dont really care about playing anyone in the SEC except AU and UT. Those games are so traditional. Those 2 are the "dont sleep all week" games. We just dont have that with other teams save maybe State who i think we have played more than we have UT.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter