Started By
Message
Should division record be the only record that matters?
Posted on 4/14/15 at 8:40 am
Posted on 4/14/15 at 8:40 am
Georgia plays both Bama and auburn this year and could very well lose to both, but still go undefeated in the east. Let's say missouri only loses to georgia, sorry really deserve to win the east. A one loss division champ over an undefeated division team?
Posted on 4/14/15 at 8:45 am to geauxnavybeatbama
It won't matter when UT runs the table
Posted on 4/14/15 at 8:53 am to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:
Should division record be the only record that matters?
No....all conference games matter...next question
Posted on 4/14/15 at 8:59 am to geauxnavybeatbama
No
If you want to go to Atlanta then win your games. Can't control the schedule, just win.
If you want to go to Atlanta then win your games. Can't control the schedule, just win.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:01 am to geauxnavybeatbama
Depends on your season goal.
For Georgia, their only realistic goal is to win the SEC East, so yes.
For 'Bama and Auburn, their realistic goal is to win National Championship, so every game matters.
For Georgia, their only realistic goal is to win the SEC East, so yes.
For 'Bama and Auburn, their realistic goal is to win National Championship, so every game matters.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:06 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
Can't control the schedule
Bama has controlled their schedule for years. Just ask any LSU fan.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:07 am to UserName69
A year or so ago I looked into this idea, and if I remember right, this never would have affected the SEC West winner. It only would have changed the SEC East.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:08 am to geauxnavybeatbama
Yes, but we should go back to a 10 team conference and play everyone.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:10 am to geauxnavybeatbama
The HBC was making this argument a few years ago and I tend to agree with it. Division record only makes more sense. That still means Mizzou was East champs the last two years though in case you were insinuating something.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:12 am to Aman
quote:
Just ask any LSU fan.
Yes, he is right.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:13 am to geauxnavybeatbama
Understand the sentiment, but that is what you get when people are so concerned with "rivalry" games. Same goes for whoever gets Vandy and Kentucky from the East though.
If Missouri (or whoever else) goes 7-1 while Georgia goes 6-2, so be it. Get a different rival.
If Missouri (or whoever else) goes 7-1 while Georgia goes 6-2, so be it. Get a different rival.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:14 am to 5thTiger
quote:
Get a different rival.
How about they just beat their rival..
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:19 am to geauxnavybeatbama
For the purpose of winning the division, yes division record should be all that matters. It's BS that a if UGA went undefeated in the East but loses to Auburn or Bama that they might not win the East.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:23 am to lsufan251875
quote:Not the last two years.
It only would have changed the SEC East.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:31 am to jbond
South Carolina swept the East in 2011 and didn't make it to Atlanta. Georgia did. Georgia has benefited now they must pay.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:32 am to BhamDore
They didn't benefit. They won more games.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:34 am to geauxnavybeatbama
Nope. They do need to dump this stupid 6-1-1 format and go to a 6-3 schedule with the additional conference game.
SEC has the most retarded scheduling format in the county.
SEC has the most retarded scheduling format in the county.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:38 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
Can't control the schedule
Don't say that in front of an LSU fan
Posted on 4/14/15 at 9:44 am to VFL1800FPD
quote:
It won't matter when UT runs the table
You can't even win the east when Florida is historically crappy, Georgia average to above average at best, SC and Kentucky really shitty and Vanderbilt back to being Vanderbilt. How are you gonna win shite when all of these teams are better this year?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News