Started By
Message

re: Is Avery Johnson's contract really 6 years 18 million?

Posted on 4/7/15 at 9:44 am to
Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time
Atlanta GA - ITP
Member since Sep 2012
24939 posts
Posted on 4/7/15 at 9:44 am to
Just sets a bad precedent. Our AD is over here making quality hires and it's costing us money when bad AD's drive up the price of doing business.
This post was edited on 4/7/15 at 9:45 am
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
25048 posts
Posted on 4/7/15 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Just sets a bad precedent. Our AD is over here making quality hires and it's costing us money when bad AD's drive up the price of doing business.


Exactly why I said I can see why it would be a concern to you more than it would be a concern to Alabama.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30290 posts
Posted on 4/7/15 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Just sets a bad precedent. Our AD is over here making quality hires and it's costing us money when bad AD's drive up the price of doing business.

And this bothers you? Why?
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37764 posts
Posted on 4/7/15 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Our AD is over here making quality hires and it's costing us money when bad AD's drive up the price of doing business.




This may be the funniest shite I have read today...
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30109 posts
Posted on 4/7/15 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Just sets a bad precedent. Our AD is over here making quality hires and it's costing us money when bad AD's drive up the price of doing business.


You might consider the value inherent in hiring an undocumented illegal-alien head coach.

Just a suggestion.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34346 posts
Posted on 4/7/15 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Just sets a bad precedent. Our AD is over here making quality hires and it's costing us money when bad AD's drive up the price of doing business.



To be fair Alabama subsidized your AD through equal revenue sharing so maybe that evens it out a little.
Posted by bona fide
Burma
Member since Jun 2010
8972 posts
Posted on 4/7/15 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Just sets a bad precedent. Our AD is over here making quality hires and it's costing us money when bad AD's drive up the price of doing business.



Your AD paid a coach that no program wanted to hire 3% of athletic revenue.

Bama paid 1.9% for their new HC.

It appears Bama has more than twice the revenue of MSU while Bama also paid less for their HC. Pay attention MSU, let the big boys show you how it is done.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter