Started By
Message
re: Police in Wash. Shoot Man Running From them with a rock in his hands.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:41 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:41 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
From the article...
So what exactly do people against a shooting like this expect police to do when they've used alternatives to try to subdue the guy?
quote:
The officers attempted to use a stun gun to incapacitate Zambrano-Montes after he would not obey commands to surrender, before they opened fire and killed him, the statement said.
So what exactly do people against a shooting like this expect police to do when they've used alternatives to try to subdue the guy?
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:53 pm to BluegrassBelle
My question as an LEO supervisor, were there Extended Range Impact Weapons (40mm, beanbag, etc) available? Pepperball?
Taser is really ineffective from far enough to be out of a rock's effective range?
Basically, had they officer's exhausted all less-lethal options prior to deadly force?
OTOH, judging an officer's actions from a videophone recording that may well have been edited to cut out the preceding events is unfair.
Taser is really ineffective from far enough to be out of a rock's effective range?
Basically, had they officer's exhausted all less-lethal options prior to deadly force?
OTOH, judging an officer's actions from a videophone recording that may well have been edited to cut out the preceding events is unfair.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:53 pm to BluegrassBelle
They shot a guy with a rock in his hand.
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:54 pm to BluegrassBelle
I don't know, not kill him. Maybe let him go and catch him another time.
Opening fire in city streets is probably far more dangerous than anything he would do with his rocks
Opening fire in city streets is probably far more dangerous than anything he would do with his rocks
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:55 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
So what exactly do people against a shooting like this expect police to do when they've used alternatives to try to subdue the guy?
Once upon a time in a history not too far away... 3 cops would have been able to tackle, subdue, and handcuff a man. Ive only seen it about one million times on the show Cops.
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:55 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
So what exactly do people against a shooting like this expect police to do when they've used alternatives to try to subdue the guy?
If 3 guys can't subdue a guy throwing rocks, perhaps they shouldn't be cops. Hopefully they no longer will be cops.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)