Started By
Message
re: UF snags 0 * Diamond in the Rough - Luke Ancrum
Posted on 2/1/15 at 3:47 pm to Tennessee Jed
Posted on 2/1/15 at 3:47 pm to Tennessee Jed
2 OL they recently snagged are unrated low 3* (83) with not so impressive offer list (FIU, Florida Atlantic, etc)
I'm not trying to flame here but why is UF struggling so much with recruiting? Muschamp, Meyer, Spurrier used to sign 5* OL and DL by default every year.
I'm not trying to flame here but why is UF struggling so much with recruiting? Muschamp, Meyer, Spurrier used to sign 5* OL and DL by default every year.
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 3:50 pm
3
Posted on 2/1/15 at 3:59 pm to Phat Phil
quote:
I'm not trying to flame here but why is UF struggling so much with recruiting? Muschamp, Meyer, Spurrier used to sign 5* OL and DL by default every year
Fl is in a unique situation this year, next year their recruiting will be right back.
Posted on 2/1/15 at 4:22 pm to Phat Phil
quote:
Muschamp used to sign 5* OL by default every year.
When did this happen? Wish it was the case, but we are in a terrible position on the offensive line because of him.
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 2/2/15 at 5:46 am to Phat Phil
"I'm not trying to flame here but why is UF struggling so much with recruiting? Muschamp, Meyer, Spurrier used to sign 5* OL and DL by default every year."
No, he didn't. That is the single biggest reason UF struggled under Muschamp. UF's OL was the worst in the conference for the last 4-5 years. Absolutely putrid. I don't think Driskell (or Brantley, either) would have struggled near as much if they had even an average OL.
No, he didn't. That is the single biggest reason UF struggled under Muschamp. UF's OL was the worst in the conference for the last 4-5 years. Absolutely putrid. I don't think Driskell (or Brantley, either) would have struggled near as much if they had even an average OL.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News