Started By
Message
Why doesn't the SEC consider renaming the divisions to North and South
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:37 pm
with minor adjustments to division membership?
North Division:
1) Missouri
2) Arkansas
3) Kentucky
4) Tennessee
5) South Carolina
6) Ole Miss (to atone for past transgressions as well as to reflect northern proximity to the more southern Mississippi State)
7) Florida (to reflect what Florida has become rather than geographical location)
South Division:
1) A&M
2) LSU
3) Miss State
4) Bama
5) Auburn
6) Georgia
7) Vandy (an exception made to give this division a much needed educational boost)
These minor adjustments make the divisions a bit more competitive with each other. The "North Division" upgrades talent with the additions of Arkansas and Ole Miss, while the "South Division" welcomes Georgia to the mix while weakening a bit with the addition of Vanderbilt.
North Division:
1) Missouri
2) Arkansas
3) Kentucky
4) Tennessee
5) South Carolina
6) Ole Miss (to atone for past transgressions as well as to reflect northern proximity to the more southern Mississippi State)
7) Florida (to reflect what Florida has become rather than geographical location)
South Division:
1) A&M
2) LSU
3) Miss State
4) Bama
5) Auburn
6) Georgia
7) Vandy (an exception made to give this division a much needed educational boost)
These minor adjustments make the divisions a bit more competitive with each other. The "North Division" upgrades talent with the additions of Arkansas and Ole Miss, while the "South Division" welcomes Georgia to the mix while weakening a bit with the addition of Vanderbilt.
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 4:48 pm
44
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:38 pm to mizzoukills
You just want the North to defeat the South you piece of shite Yankee
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:38 pm to mizzoukills
Florida would love that. Everyone else - not so much.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:39 pm to mizzoukills
Big 6 has to be divided equally. It is why Auburn is not in the east and Mizzou is.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:40 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
North and South
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:41 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
mizzoukills
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:42 pm to mizzoukills
I.want.to.flame.but.dat.schedule
When people think of Northern Cousin frickers - think Arkansas
When people think of Northern Cousin frickers - think Arkansas
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:42 pm to mizzoukills
This is just awful killz. Just awful
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:44 pm to mizzoukills
The North would be even worse than the East is now.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:45 pm to mizzoukills
So you want Ole Miss to win the division every year? Thanks.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:45 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
7) Florida (to reflect what Florida has become rather than geographical location)
It becomes clear you have not been to Gainesville.
Northern Florida is southern
Southern Florida is where all the Yankees go to retire.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:46 pm to mizzoukills
damn Yankee.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:47 pm to mizzoukills
I've been in favor of annually realigning divisions based on the previous season's records. It makes sense. Leaving divisions as is without regard to performance is actually quite antiquated. True, you never know for sure how a team will perform the next season, but realigning the divisions makes just as much sense as leaving them the same, IMO.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:49 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Georgia to the mix while weakening a bit with the addition of Vanderbilt.
You take out Ole Miss & Arky....and add UGA & Vandy..if anything UGA alone makes it more difficult than what it was
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:56 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
) A&M
2) LSU
3) Miss State
4) Bama
5) Auburn
6) Georgia
got dang
Winning that division would be murder
Posted on 12/9/14 at 4:59 pm to mizzoukills
because this the fricking southeastern conference. get this north bullshite out of here
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:01 pm to mizzoukills
Crazy Idea for divisions that might just work.
East
1) Georgia
2) Florida
3) Kentucky
4) South Carolina
5) Tennessee
6) Vandy
West
1) Alabama
2) Arkansas
3) Auburn
4) LSU
5) Miss State
6) Ole miss
East
1) Georgia
2) Florida
3) Kentucky
4) South Carolina
5) Tennessee
6) Vandy
West
1) Alabama
2) Arkansas
3) Auburn
4) LSU
5) Miss State
6) Ole miss
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:03 pm to mizzoukills
Southeastern conference south and southeastern conference north... Name is just unbearably awful.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:09 pm to mizzoukills
why not just make two fricking random division is you are gonna put florida in the north and Vanderbilt in the south.
Also Panhandle is redneck south.
the southern part is basically New York. and Havana mixed together
Also Panhandle is redneck south.
the southern part is basically New York. and Havana mixed together
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:14 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Why doesn't the SEC consider renaming the divisions to North and South
'Cause we wide.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News