Started By
Message
The Perfect Playoff System
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:36 am
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:36 am
8 Team Playoff
Winners of Power Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12
3 At Large Bids
- AT LEAST 2 teams from Non-Power Conferences (MEAC, AA, USA, Independents, Mid-American, Mountain West, Sun Belt)
The 3 At large could be rethought. I'd like to see some cinderella teams in football. Always makes the NCAA Tourney fun.
Winners of Power Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12
3 At Large Bids
- AT LEAST 2 teams from Non-Power Conferences (MEAC, AA, USA, Independents, Mid-American, Mountain West, Sun Belt)
The 3 At large could be rethought. I'd like to see some cinderella teams in football. Always makes the NCAA Tourney fun.
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 10:33 am
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:38 am to i am dan
north dakota st vs FSU would be a good game
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:38 am to i am dan
Good luck getting views from fsu vs ewu
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:46 am to i am dan
quote:
i am dan
Hey, Bill. Stfu.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:09 am to i am dan
quote:
8 Team Playoff
Winners of BCS Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12
I agree with this part with 1 caveat...each conference champion must play in a conference championship game...thus the Big 12 would have to add a couple more teams. I think this would add to the intensity of the conference championships as they would add another level to the play-offs...
For the 3 at large, I'd have the 3 highest ranking champions from non-Big 5 conferences. This could be done via a specific poll or by selection committee. Only conference champions get in, so Notre Dame would have to join a conference to qualify...
Don't think it'll happen but that's how I'd do it...
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 8:10 am
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:12 am to i am dan
Any "fair" playoff system would require re-aligning conferences and centralizing scheduling so that every team played roughly equivalent opposition. Then you you have the conference champions in the playoffs. And add some stupid "wild card" system like the pros.
Since the whole purpose of the playoff system is to add games and generate TV revenue, I expect we will see something like this soon. The recent move by the "Big 5" conferences is just the latest step into turning CFB into NFL Jr.
And it's a damned shame.
Since the whole purpose of the playoff system is to add games and generate TV revenue, I expect we will see something like this soon. The recent move by the "Big 5" conferences is just the latest step into turning CFB into NFL Jr.
And it's a damned shame.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:16 am to i am dan
I like 12 teams. 8 conference champs, plus 4 at large. Top 4 conference champs get a bye, then use BCS(or something) to seed rest 5-12(regardless of at large or not).
I think this allows the smaller conferences a chanc, plus keeps the regular season meaningful, because you want to finish in the top 4 for the bye. Games up to semi's played at the home of the higher seed.
I think this allows the smaller conferences a chanc, plus keeps the regular season meaningful, because you want to finish in the top 4 for the bye. Games up to semi's played at the home of the higher seed.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:16 am to i am dan
quote:
Winners of FBS DIV I Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12
This is solid and speaks to facts, I like the 3 At Large but somehow they need to be fact based choices, not opinions
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:26 am to i am dan
- 8 teams
- 5 conf champions and the 3 highest ranked at larges using the BCS formula
- Rank them 1-8 using BCS formula
- Round of 8 (first 4 games) are played January 1st on top 4 teams campuses
- Round of 4 (2 games) played in rotating BCS bowls on January 7th
- Round of 2 (title game) played in rotating BCS bowl on January 14th
This satisfies playoff need, conference championship importance, timeline for student athletes, brings major money to top 4 teams with onsite games, and still uses the BCS games.
- 5 conf champions and the 3 highest ranked at larges using the BCS formula
- Rank them 1-8 using BCS formula
- Round of 8 (first 4 games) are played January 1st on top 4 teams campuses
- Round of 4 (2 games) played in rotating BCS bowls on January 7th
- Round of 2 (title game) played in rotating BCS bowl on January 14th
This satisfies playoff need, conference championship importance, timeline for student athletes, brings major money to top 4 teams with onsite games, and still uses the BCS games.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:47 am to i am dan
3 playoff games to win a title. No thanks.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:17 am to i am dan
quote:
The Perfect Playoff System
- AT LEAST 2 teams from FBS Div II Conferences
wtf is a FBS Div II conference?
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:24 am to i am dan
quote:
8 Team Playoff
Winners of FBS DIV I Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12
3 At Large Bids
- AT LEAST 2 teams from FBS Div II Conferences
I agree, except you got the at-large bids wrong.
They should be selected from the champions of the remaining FBS conferences (not sure where you got "FBS Div II" from, Div II is not FBS):
AAC
CUSA
MAC
MWC
Sun Belt
The top 3 champions of these conferences based on SOS should fill the last three spots.
No 'wildcard', no 'bye', a straight up tournament of champions. You don't win your conference championship, you don't advance.
Minimal controversy.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:26 am to i am dan
So let teams schedule cream puffs an still allow them in with a loss?
What don't you like about the current system?
What don't you like about the current system?
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:26 am to i am dan
This would be a HELL of a lot better than the current system, which imo shouldn't even be called a "playoff".
As stated above, any "perfect" system has to mean that every team has an opportunity to win it all, but not with a drastically easier schedule. So there must be conference realignment and/or purging some teams from D-1 if there is ever to be anything near a "perfect" playoff.
As stated above, any "perfect" system has to mean that every team has an opportunity to win it all, but not with a drastically easier schedule. So there must be conference realignment and/or purging some teams from D-1 if there is ever to be anything near a "perfect" playoff.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:47 am to i am dan
Sorry, I can't agree with this; I want the best teams in the playoffs and if a particular conference is weak in a given season, you end up not having the best teams. However, I believe that's pretty much we are going to have with this playoff selection committee. The selection committee members are going to be instructed to disregard the polls so even if say Auburn and Alabama are #1 and #4 in the polls, there will be only one SEC team in the playoffs, bank on it. The committee WILL be biased toward the conference champions and since the Big 12 doesn't have a conference championship, they will be the odd man out all other factors being pretty equal. I promise you the other conferences NEVER EVER want to see another all SEC championship.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:06 am to i am dan
No. Just no.
They should just take the top 16 teams in AP ranking.
Pair them off.
Play each game at the higher seed's location until you reach the finals.
Each round everyone is paired so the higher seeds always go against the lower seeds. (ie no bracket)
The final 2 teams play at whatever bowl that year hosts the national championship.
So if the playoffs started this week round 1 would be.....
Notre Dame vs Florida State
Ole Miss vs Alabama
USC vs Oregon
Stanford vs Oklahoma
LSU vs Auburn
UCLA vs Georgia
Baylor vs Michigan State
Texas A&M vs Ohio State
They should just take the top 16 teams in AP ranking.
Pair them off.
Play each game at the higher seed's location until you reach the finals.
Each round everyone is paired so the higher seeds always go against the lower seeds. (ie no bracket)
The final 2 teams play at whatever bowl that year hosts the national championship.
So if the playoffs started this week round 1 would be.....
Notre Dame vs Florida State
Ole Miss vs Alabama
USC vs Oregon
Stanford vs Oklahoma
LSU vs Auburn
UCLA vs Georgia
Baylor vs Michigan State
Texas A&M vs Ohio State
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 10:07 am
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:25 am to i am dan
I prefer a playoff system that gives a team two chances to get in. all other sports give teams two chances. your scenario gives them only one.
for example:
12 conf. champs
4 at large
this way...if you don't win the conference, you can still get in as an at large. OR, if you lose to a shitty team outside of conference, your season is not over yet and you still can get in with a conf. title. ala basketball.
TWO CHANCES!!!!
for example:
12 conf. champs
4 at large
this way...if you don't win the conference, you can still get in as an at large. OR, if you lose to a shitty team outside of conference, your season is not over yet and you still can get in with a conf. title. ala basketball.
TWO CHANCES!!!!
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:16 pm to i am dan
It should be a 10-team playoff:
1st SEC East
1st SEC West
2nd SEC East
2nd SEC West
3rd SEC East
3rd SEC West
4th SEC East
4th SEC West
5th SEC East
5th SEC West
1st SEC East
1st SEC West
2nd SEC East
2nd SEC West
3rd SEC East
3rd SEC West
4th SEC East
4th SEC West
5th SEC East
5th SEC West
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News