Started By
Message

The Perfect Playoff System

Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:36 am
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24838 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:36 am
8 Team Playoff

Winners of Power Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12

3 At Large Bids
- AT LEAST 2 teams from Non-Power Conferences (MEAC, AA, USA, Independents, Mid-American, Mountain West, Sun Belt)


The 3 At large could be rethought. I'd like to see some cinderella teams in football. Always makes the NCAA Tourney fun.
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 10:33 am
Posted by cbi8
Nashville
Member since Mar 2012
6801 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:38 am to
north dakota st vs FSU would be a good game
Posted by tamctshirt
Member since Aug 2014
1415 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:38 am to

Good luck getting views from fsu vs ewu
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:46 am to
quote:

i am dan



Hey, Bill. Stfu.
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
9914 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:51 am to
Posted by Cockeee Don
Myrtle Beach, SC
Member since Jul 2014
690 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 7:54 am to
...Doesn't exist.
Posted by OldPete
Georgia
Member since Oct 2013
2804 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:09 am to
quote:

8 Team Playoff

Winners of BCS Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12


I agree with this part with 1 caveat...each conference champion must play in a conference championship game...thus the Big 12 would have to add a couple more teams. I think this would add to the intensity of the conference championships as they would add another level to the play-offs...

For the 3 at large, I'd have the 3 highest ranking champions from non-Big 5 conferences. This could be done via a specific poll or by selection committee. Only conference champions get in, so Notre Dame would have to join a conference to qualify...

Don't think it'll happen but that's how I'd do it...
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 8:10 am
Posted by BammerDelendaEst
Member since Jan 2014
2212 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:12 am to
Any "fair" playoff system would require re-aligning conferences and centralizing scheduling so that every team played roughly equivalent opposition. Then you you have the conference champions in the playoffs. And add some stupid "wild card" system like the pros.

Since the whole purpose of the playoff system is to add games and generate TV revenue, I expect we will see something like this soon. The recent move by the "Big 5" conferences is just the latest step into turning CFB into NFL Jr.

And it's a damned shame.
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9600 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:16 am to
I like 12 teams. 8 conference champs, plus 4 at large. Top 4 conference champs get a bye, then use BCS(or something) to seed rest 5-12(regardless of at large or not).
I think this allows the smaller conferences a chanc, plus keeps the regular season meaningful, because you want to finish in the top 4 for the bye. Games up to semi's played at the home of the higher seed.
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Winners of FBS DIV I Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12


This is solid and speaks to facts, I like the 3 At Large but somehow they need to be fact based choices, not opinions
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:26 am to
- 8 teams
- 5 conf champions and the 3 highest ranked at larges using the BCS formula
- Rank them 1-8 using BCS formula
- Round of 8 (first 4 games) are played January 1st on top 4 teams campuses
- Round of 4 (2 games) played in rotating BCS bowls on January 7th
- Round of 2 (title game) played in rotating BCS bowl on January 14th

This satisfies playoff need, conference championship importance, timeline for student athletes, brings major money to top 4 teams with onsite games, and still uses the BCS games.
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
23173 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:47 am to
3 playoff games to win a title. No thanks.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26991 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:17 am to
quote:

The Perfect Playoff System

- AT LEAST 2 teams from FBS Div II Conferences




wtf is a FBS Div II conference?
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:24 am to
quote:

8 Team Playoff

Winners of FBS DIV I Conference Championships
- ACC
- SEC
- Big10
- Big12
- Pac12

3 At Large Bids
- AT LEAST 2 teams from FBS Div II Conferences

I agree, except you got the at-large bids wrong.

They should be selected from the champions of the remaining FBS conferences (not sure where you got "FBS Div II" from, Div II is not FBS):

AAC
CUSA
MAC
MWC
Sun Belt

The top 3 champions of these conferences based on SOS should fill the last three spots.

No 'wildcard', no 'bye', a straight up tournament of champions. You don't win your conference championship, you don't advance.

Minimal controversy.

Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:26 am to
So let teams schedule cream puffs an still allow them in with a loss?

What don't you like about the current system?
Posted by Crimson Legend
Mount St Gumpus
Member since Nov 2004
15478 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:26 am to
This would be a HELL of a lot better than the current system, which imo shouldn't even be called a "playoff".

As stated above, any "perfect" system has to mean that every team has an opportunity to win it all, but not with a drastically easier schedule. So there must be conference realignment and/or purging some teams from D-1 if there is ever to be anything near a "perfect" playoff.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:47 am to
Sorry, I can't agree with this; I want the best teams in the playoffs and if a particular conference is weak in a given season, you end up not having the best teams. However, I believe that's pretty much we are going to have with this playoff selection committee. The selection committee members are going to be instructed to disregard the polls so even if say Auburn and Alabama are #1 and #4 in the polls, there will be only one SEC team in the playoffs, bank on it. The committee WILL be biased toward the conference champions and since the Big 12 doesn't have a conference championship, they will be the odd man out all other factors being pretty equal. I promise you the other conferences NEVER EVER want to see another all SEC championship.
Posted by The7Sins
Truth or Consequences, New Mexico
Member since Nov 2012
1178 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:06 am to
No. Just no.

They should just take the top 16 teams in AP ranking.
Pair them off.
Play each game at the higher seed's location until you reach the finals.
Each round everyone is paired so the higher seeds always go against the lower seeds. (ie no bracket)
The final 2 teams play at whatever bowl that year hosts the national championship.

So if the playoffs started this week round 1 would be.....

Notre Dame vs Florida State
Ole Miss vs Alabama
USC vs Oregon
Stanford vs Oklahoma
LSU vs Auburn
UCLA vs Georgia
Baylor vs Michigan State
Texas A&M vs Ohio State
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 10:07 am
Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7808 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:25 am to
I prefer a playoff system that gives a team two chances to get in. all other sports give teams two chances. your scenario gives them only one.

for example:

12 conf. champs
4 at large

this way...if you don't win the conference, you can still get in as an at large. OR, if you lose to a shitty team outside of conference, your season is not over yet and you still can get in with a conf. title. ala basketball.

TWO CHANCES!!!!
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9513 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:16 pm to
It should be a 10-team playoff:

1st SEC East
1st SEC West
2nd SEC East
2nd SEC West
3rd SEC East
3rd SEC West
4th SEC East
4th SEC West
5th SEC East
5th SEC West
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter