Started By
Message
re: Does anyone actually believe this
Posted on 7/6/14 at 3:57 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Posted on 7/6/14 at 3:57 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
"Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93–94 AD, includes two references to the biblical Jesus Christ in Books 18 and 20 and a reference to John the Baptist in Book 18.[3][4]"
You don't find it strange that he only thought to mention such a historical figure 60 years after the man had died?
Say, how do you think Jesus looked?
You don't find it strange that he only thought to mention such a historical figure 60 years after the man had died?
Say, how do you think Jesus looked?
Posted on 7/6/14 at 4:00 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
Say, how do you think Jesus looked?
You are better than your posts in this thread.
But he was dark. Not Tbird dark, but dark.
Posted on 7/6/14 at 4:06 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
You don't find it strange that he only thought to mention such a historical figure 60 years after the man had died? Say, how do you think Jesus looked?
I think historians are sometimes strange, what is it to me though what they decide to write about? I'm just saying that a non-connected source referenced Jesus's existence, which Josephus is and did. What are you getting at? You've admitted he did also. That's all my point was.
Why do you think I know what Jesus looked like? That's a clown question, bro.
This post was edited on 7/6/14 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 7/7/14 at 2:29 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
"Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93–94 AD, includes two references to the biblical Jesus Christ in Books 18 and 20 and a reference to John the Baptist in Book 18.[3][4]"
----------------------------------------------
Agreed. And the reason he was mentioned was not because he was alive and active, but because of the talk concerning him and the birth of the new religon (Christanity) that was begining to grow. Historians notice that sort of thing.
----------------------------------------------
Agreed. And the reason he was mentioned was not because he was alive and active, but because of the talk concerning him and the birth of the new religon (Christanity) that was begining to grow. Historians notice that sort of thing.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)