Started By
Message

What if Georgia Tech and Tulane had never left the SEC?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:27 pm
What would the make up of the conference look like today?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:29 pm to msudawg1200
Add GT & Tulane and there ya go!
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:30 pm to msudawg1200
MSU would average 1 more win per season
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:34 pm to msudawg1200
LSU would actually have a rival and a losing record against Tulane.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:36 pm to GridironLeatherhead
If it were to ever happen, this would be the year
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:43 pm to msudawg1200
Old Tulane Stadium would be still standing
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:44 pm to Johnny Ringo
quote:
MSU would average 1 more win per season
BOOM!
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:45 pm to msudawg1200
Tulane would've been much more successful than Vanderbilt to this point and more successful than they have been without the SEC. Georgia Tech would be less successful than they have been in the ACC
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:45 pm to msudawg1200
A lot more like the ACC academically!
Vanderbilt is AAU
Florida is AAU
Tulane is AAU
Georgia Tech is AAU
in the 1990 realignment the SEC would not need to add anybody to have a SEC CCG. If they did expand in the early 90's it may have been to add academic as well as athletic schools. lets say Texas A&M and Maryland. Since the ACC only had 7 or 8 teams at this time, Kramer & Co may have gone straight for the jugular and picked off the ACC when they were still most vulnerable. Imagine if the SEC had added UNC and UVA back then when it was highly possible.
SEC 12= Alabama, Auburn, UF, UGA, Georgia Tech, UK, LSU, Ole Miss, State, Tulane, UT, and Vanderbilt
SEC 14 = add Maryland and Texas A&M
SEC 16 = add North Carolina and Virginia
In such a realignment 8 of 16 members would be AAU schools making a very academic conference indeed. In the subsequent years having 8 AAU member schools may have added a few more by now with UGA being the first in.
Vanderbilt is AAU
Florida is AAU
Tulane is AAU
Georgia Tech is AAU
in the 1990 realignment the SEC would not need to add anybody to have a SEC CCG. If they did expand in the early 90's it may have been to add academic as well as athletic schools. lets say Texas A&M and Maryland. Since the ACC only had 7 or 8 teams at this time, Kramer & Co may have gone straight for the jugular and picked off the ACC when they were still most vulnerable. Imagine if the SEC had added UNC and UVA back then when it was highly possible.
SEC 12= Alabama, Auburn, UF, UGA, Georgia Tech, UK, LSU, Ole Miss, State, Tulane, UT, and Vanderbilt
SEC 14 = add Maryland and Texas A&M
SEC 16 = add North Carolina and Virginia
In such a realignment 8 of 16 members would be AAU schools making a very academic conference indeed. In the subsequent years having 8 AAU member schools may have added a few more by now with UGA being the first in.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:48 pm to Johnny Ringo
GT would win about as often as they lost to MSU. Tulane would have dropped out long ago.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:48 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
Georgia Tech would be less successful than they have been in the ACC
wut?
Georgia Tech had 3 MNC's in the SEC with 3 different coaches. They would probably be the lead dog in Georgia right now.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:52 pm to Cheese Grits
So playing in the SEC would make their program better then ours?
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:53 pm to Cheese Grits
So did Ole Miss... it's called the 1950s
Tech would never have won a championship since they left like they did in 1990
Tech would never have won a championship since they left like they did in 1990
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:53 pm to msudawg1200
thought this was a "30 for 30" thread.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 7:54 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
wut?
Georgia Tech had 3 MNC's in the SEC with 3 different coaches. They would probably be the lead dog in Georgia right now.
They weren't even the lead dog in 09.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:01 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
So playing in the SEC would make their program better then ours?
They were like Notre Dame of the South.
Won a MNC in the WW I era with Heisman
Won a MNC in the Jazz Age with Alexander
Won a MNC post WW II with Dodds
If Dodds does not get in a hissy fit with Bear Bryant he probably continues to dominate the Dawgs.
Dodd also understood the deep-seated rivalry with the University of Georgia. His teams won 8 games in a row over the Bulldogs from 1946–1954 outscoring the Bulldogs 176–39 during the winning streak. This 8–game winning streak against Georgia remains the longest winning streak by either team in the series.
Best thing that ever happened to UGA football was Tech leaving the SEC! Dodd's would often say later it was the biggest mistake Tech ever made in leaving the SEC.
As for Tulane, never forget they were an early power and were the one who should have played the Rose Bowl that Bama got after the Tulane did not accept for for the lost school time it would have caused. We have the Sugar Bowl because of Tulane, not LSU.
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:13 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
Best thing that ever happened to UGA football was Tech leaving the SEC! Dodd's would often say later it was the biggest mistake Tech ever made in leaving the SEC.
Mainly sux being out of the SEC but if any school can handle the tuff road, it's Georgia Tech.
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:19 pm to Cheese Grits
By 1960 the series favored Georgia 28-26-5
Georgia can also claim titles in '20, '27, and '42.
The series would be closer but Tech has never been the big brother
Georgia can also claim titles in '20, '27, and '42.
The series would be closer but Tech has never been the big brother
This post was edited on 6/26/14 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 6/26/14 at 8:25 pm to dawgfan24348
Well they could also claim more if you want to bring up 20 and 27.
Popular
Back to top

9











