Started By
Message
re: Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 8:21 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 4/22/14 at 8:21 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Two great eras?
Yes, two great era's. You "claim" a bunch of retroactive NC's, that any one of 6-7 other teams could "claim" a NC in that same year. The bear era, and saban's era, are the two era's. Stalling's had a few good years. He also got you put on probation. I am quite sure that wasn't his only transgression while at bama. I don't ever remember Auburn having a run like bama had from '97-2007. You can do some research. I would like to know if Auburn was that bad for that period of time.
2
Posted on 4/22/14 at 8:34 pm to MrAUTigers
Stassen is working again...
1983-1999
Alabama 141-65
Auburn 139-56
This includes Alabama's 9 forfeited games in 1993 (wins turned to losses).
1983-1999
Alabama 141-65
Auburn 139-56
This includes Alabama's 9 forfeited games in 1993 (wins turned to losses).
Posted on 4/23/14 at 9:20 am to MrAUTigers
quote:
I don't ever remember Auburn having a run like bama had from '97-2007.
Holy shite, Bama's record from 1997-2007 was 53-61.
That's behind even Kentucky.
I don't know if Auburn's ever played an entire decade of football that was measurably worse than friggin' KENTUCKY.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News