Started By
Message
Post your favorite Flight 370 conspiracy theory here.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:02 pm
21
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:05 pm to Remote Controlled
It's Bush's fault
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:14 pm to Remote Controlled
There was never a plane to begin with.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:14 pm to Vols&Shaft83
:inb4crazyMizzoupeople:
Wait... shite.
Wait... shite.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:15 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
It's Bush's fault
So, you're in the NWO is involved, and has hijacked a plane for nefarious purposes/false flag camp.
Got it.
All conspiracies are on the table at this point.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:15 pm to Remote Controlled
pirates
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:17 pm to Remote Controlled
it's the Arabs. fricking terrorists.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:18 pm to Remote Controlled
CNN actually reporting on my posted theory...
It's on bitches.
It's on bitches.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:44 pm to Remote Controlled
The Pterodactyl got tired because Fred put on 2 racks of ribs and wore his Water Buffalo hat. It is at Wally-World waiting to pick up the Griswald's.
Ok seriously, the pilot or navigator decided to take said plane to Ho Chi Mihn City to be reversed enginered by the North Koreans and Vietnamese.
Ok seriously, the pilot or navigator decided to take said plane to Ho Chi Mihn City to be reversed enginered by the North Koreans and Vietnamese.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:49 pm to Remote Controlled
I'm on board.
I'll put a fiver on "Turkmenistan."
I'll put a fiver on "Turkmenistan."
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:54 pm to sms151t
The only people that could reasonable reverse engineer and produce something from the results are the Russians and the Chinese. I wouldn't be surprised, but Chinese and Russian airlines own plenty of these planes that could be made to disappear without making hundreds of people disappear along with it.
My guess? It was hijacked and shot down by some country that doesn't want to admit they shot down a civilian airliner.
Second guess? Piece of shite suicidal pilot/life insurance scenario.
Third? We'll see it fly into something a year from now. However, if they were going to do that I don't see why you don't just fly into the Petronas Towers without making is disappear/refueling/whatever.
My guess? It was hijacked and shot down by some country that doesn't want to admit they shot down a civilian airliner.
Second guess? Piece of shite suicidal pilot/life insurance scenario.
Third? We'll see it fly into something a year from now. However, if they were going to do that I don't see why you don't just fly into the Petronas Towers without making is disappear/refueling/whatever.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:56 pm to Remote Controlled
Randy was on the plane.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 6:07 pm to diddydirtyAubie
Randy was the pilot..... Your head just exploded
Posted on 3/17/14 at 6:10 pm to WhistlinDixie15
Randy found poop in his Tacoma truck, and shot down a plane in anger.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 6:16 pm to Remote Controlled
I don't think your link is so much a theory, as it is a logical explanation for how a plane can travel without being detected.
It makes sense.
It makes sense.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 6:16 pm to WhistlinDixie15
You don't want to know my theory
Posted on 3/17/14 at 6:28 pm to Remote Controlled
I think the co-pilot killed the pilot, turned off the communications system, took the plane to 45,000 feet to kill the passengers and crew and then flew the plane as far into the Indian Ocean as possible in hopes that it will never be found. Why? Insurance policies he left for someone. The dude was crazy.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 6:29 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I don't think your link is so much a theory, as it is a logical explanation for how a plane can travel without being detected.
It makes a lot of sense from a radar standpoint, but it doesn't take a lot of things into account like whether or not the plane they would trail would be delayed, wouldn't change speed during cruise, wouldn't do a lot of things.
It is possible to shadow a plane for hours, but it's not an exact science. They had to count on the Malaysians not scrambling fighters to see the unidentified aircraft flying through the airspace (which wound up being the case) while they travelled to the airway at which they would intercept the normally scheduled flight (that couldn't have been delayed) and then follow them. If they arrived at the intercept too early they'd have been seen. It just seems like trying to get to a place at a certain time to not be seen by the flight you're shadowing and yet to close enough to disappear would be tough. Not impossible, but tough. Maybe that was the cause for the flight sim in the pilot's house, but I'm reluctant to use a flight sim setup as an implication of guilt base on my personal home flight sim setup.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 6:31 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I don't think your link is so much a theory, as it is a logical explanation for how a plane can travel without being detected. It makes sense.
As someone who works "in the field", this is plausible. However, it would require "on the stick" flying for hours on end.
Not likely from a hijacker, and tough, even for an experienced pilot.
Unless, said pilot had trained himself on the stick for hours at a time on FSX.
Even then it would take some serious flying to stay in another jumbos shadow, and not get hung up in the wake turbulence.
So it's on the stick x10. Sounds super tough, if accomplished, this guy is Maverick and Chappy all rolled up in one.
I'll call him Chaperick.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 6:35 pm to Mizzeaux
quote:
It makes a lot of sense from a radar standpoint, but it doesn't take a lot of things into account like whether or not the plane they would trail would be delayed, wouldn't change speed during cruise, wouldn't do a lot of things.
quote:
f they arrived at the intercept too early they'd have been seen. It just seems like trying to get to a place at a certain time to not be seen by the flight you're shadowing and yet to close enough to disappear would be tough. Not impossible, but tough.
I agree.
Intercepting a plane and remaining behind it for hours seems like a risky thing to hedge this entire operation on.
quote:
Maybe that was the cause for the flight sim in the pilot's house, but I'm reluctant to use a flight sim setup as an implication of guilt base on my personal home flight sim setup
That's cool you have a flight simulator. Maybe it's my tin foil ways, but in this case I think there is great relevance to him owning a flight simulator.
Has it been confirmed that his wife and kids moved out of their home the day before the flight? Or is that nonsense?
This post was edited on 3/17/14 at 6:36 pm
Page 1 of 4
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News