Started By
Message

re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping

Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:41 pm to
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19751 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

You cannot simultaneously depend upon a style of play that attempts to wear down other teams and complain about getting exhausted on defense and expect to be taken seriously.
our style of play also allows the other team to substitute on defense pretty much at will, because we focus on trying to beat you with more skilled players and execution, not pre snap garbage. You are free to run whatever defense you think can stop us. Also, you sure changed gears after i destroyed you in the previous argument.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111802 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Also, you sure changed gears after i destroyed you in the previous argument

No, you didn't destroy me in any argument. There's nothing in the rules which demonstrates substitution on every play is part of the "spirit of the rules" of football. But you have no idea what that even means, so I stopped talking about it.

You realize that you're making the same arguments against the HUNH that were made against having separate offensive and defensive units when the substitution rules changed back in the middle of the last century?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter