Started By
Message

re: A rule change I think we can all agree upon

Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:42 am to
Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:42 am to
I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:45 am to
quote:

I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.


Agreed...thank god for timeouts.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:46 am to
Clearly no one agrees about the proposed rule you're referring to. I am curious as to why you had to stir that shite in this tread and couldn't just stick to the topic?

Good on them for realizing the obvious faults of the targeting rule.
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
10522 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:48 am to
I also agree that turkey sandwiches are superior to ham sandwiches.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44337 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 11:10 am to
quote:

I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.


Actually, I think most people here would agree that this is stupid. Defenses can sub whenever they want, they just have to be quick about it if a team is in HUNH. Too often a team gets flagged because the guy being subbed out is hardly jogging to get off the field. Have your team man up and sprint off the field if you want to sub when an offense is going up tempo.

This coming from a fan of a team that hardly ever runs HUNH.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter