Started By
Message
re: A rule change I think we can all agree upon
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:42 am to parkjas2001
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:42 am to parkjas2001
I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:45 am to Aman
quote:
I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.
Agreed...thank god for timeouts.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:46 am to Aman
Clearly no one agrees about the proposed rule you're referring to. I am curious as to why you had to stir that shite in this tread and couldn't just stick to the topic?
Good on them for realizing the obvious faults of the targeting rule.
Good on them for realizing the obvious faults of the targeting rule.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 10:48 am to Aman
I also agree that turkey sandwiches are superior to ham sandwiches.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 11:10 am to Aman
quote:
I think we should all be able to agree that defenses shouldn't be at the mercy of the offense to determine when they can substitute.
Actually, I think most people here would agree that this is stupid. Defenses can sub whenever they want, they just have to be quick about it if a team is in HUNH. Too often a team gets flagged because the guy being subbed out is hardly jogging to get off the field. Have your team man up and sprint off the field if you want to sub when an offense is going up tempo.
This coming from a fan of a team that hardly ever runs HUNH.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News