Started By
Message
re: So, is it true Bama gave Roc Thomas the stiffarm waiting on LF?
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:10 am to parkjas2001
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:10 am to parkjas2001
Every program misses out on prospects. I find it laughable that other fan bases expect us to be unsatisfied with this class because we didn't get LF or Thomas. We brought in four last year (three now minus Kamara) and already have Yeldon and Drake in place. Our class wasn't dependent on a RB. Losing Thomas is not even comparable to Auburn losing Evans.
3
Posted on 2/7/14 at 9:17 am to AHM21
quote:
Every program misses out on prospects. I find it laughable that other fan bases expect us to be unsatisfied with this class because we didn't get LF or Thomas. We brought in four last year (three now minus Kamara) and already have Yeldon and Drake in place. Our class wasn't dependent on a RB. Losing Thomas is not even comparable to Auburn losing Evans.
No I'm sure Les and Malzahn have never not signed a recruit they wanted.
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:23 am to AHM21
quote:
Losing Thomas is not even comparable to Auburn losing Evans.
I did my fair share of melting, but this is pretty comparable actually.
Getting Evans wouldn't have actually addressed a severe need in this class. Would have definitely been nice to have him but not getting Roc would be much worse for us going forward.
Granted, Bama doesn't need Evans as much as we need Roc, but Evans was far from the be-all-end-all need of our class.
This post was edited on 2/7/14 at 10:25 am
Posted on 2/7/14 at 10:26 am to AHM21
quote:Racean Thomas was a need for Auburn (Tre Mason gone this year, Cam Artis-Payne and Corey Grant gone next year), RaShaan Evans was a luxury for either Auburn or Alabama.
Losing Thomas is not even comparable to Auburn losing Evans.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News