Started By
Message

How the Super Bowl players were ranked when they were recruits
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:40 pm
Denver Broncos: LINK
Five-Stars: 1
Four-Stars: 12
Three-Stars: 15
Two-Stars: 14
Unranked: 9
Pre-Rivals: 13
Seattle Seahawks: LINK
Five-Stars: 3
Four-Stars: 8
Three-Stars: 19
Two-Stars: 12
Unranked: 12
Pre-Rivals: 7
3 stars, 2 stars, and 0 stars doing work
Five-Stars: 1
Four-Stars: 12
Three-Stars: 15
Two-Stars: 14
Unranked: 9
Pre-Rivals: 13
Seattle Seahawks: LINK
Five-Stars: 3
Four-Stars: 8
Three-Stars: 19
Two-Stars: 12
Unranked: 12
Pre-Rivals: 7
quote:
Bo Mattingly ?@SportsTalkwBo 35m
Bielema: In the Super Bowl, I had four players - two 3-stars, a 2-star and a 0-star.
3 stars, 2 stars, and 0 stars doing work
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:41 pm to hawgfaninc
Wish we could have added a few 2 stars and 0 stars to our class.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:43 pm to hawgfaninc
What else can BB say to excuse Arkansas recruiting?
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:43 pm to hawgfaninc
D Thomas wasn't a 5 star? I know Peyton was.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:43 pm to volfan30
That's simply because there are tons more 3*s and 2* players than there are 5*. Don't be fooled by those numbers. 5* players have the highest perentage of players that end up in the NFL.
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:44 pm to hawgfaninc
I haven't checked, but I take this post to mean that Arky didn't finish strong today.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:45 pm to hawgfaninc
now do it for just the starters
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:46 pm to Dplymkr88
quote:
D Thomas wasn't a 5 star?
Thomas was a nobody. Went to GT as an athlete and all he did there was run fast and jump high. He didn't learn to run a route till he was in Denver. Kid is a physical freak though.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:46 pm to WDE24
quote:
I haven't checked, but I take this post to mean that Arky didn't finish strong today.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:46 pm to hawgfaninc
Whatever makes ya feel better
Enjoy another 0-8
Enjoy another 0-8
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:48 pm to TigerBait2008
Holy frick...this is pathetic Bielema (excuse the spelling...im sauced!)
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:49 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
we finished strong enough
for....?
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:53 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
hat's simply because there are tons more 3*s and 2* players than there are 5*.
k
they're still good enough to make NFL rosters, play in the NFL, and many times out perform the higher ranked recruits
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:53 pm to hawgfaninc
THERE ARE VERY FEW FIVE STARS.
THERE ARE NOT MANY 4 STARS.
THERE ARE AN ABSURD AMOUNT OF 3 STAR AND LESS PLAYERS.
THUS, THE PERCENTAGE OF 4 AND 5 STAR PLAYERS THAT END UP BEING STUDS IN COLLEGE AND THE NFL IS MUCH, MUCH HIGHER THAN THAT OF 3 AND LESS STARS.
THUS, IF YOU SIGN ALL 4 AND 5 STAR PLAYERS YOU RAISE YOUR CHANCES AT WINNING BIG EXPONENTIALLY.
PEOPLE WON'T EVER UNDERSTAND THIS BECAUSE PEOPLE frickING SUCK.
Sorry for the caps lock. I feel like its the only way to get that point across
THERE ARE NOT MANY 4 STARS.
THERE ARE AN ABSURD AMOUNT OF 3 STAR AND LESS PLAYERS.
THUS, THE PERCENTAGE OF 4 AND 5 STAR PLAYERS THAT END UP BEING STUDS IN COLLEGE AND THE NFL IS MUCH, MUCH HIGHER THAN THAT OF 3 AND LESS STARS.
THUS, IF YOU SIGN ALL 4 AND 5 STAR PLAYERS YOU RAISE YOUR CHANCES AT WINNING BIG EXPONENTIALLY.
PEOPLE WON'T EVER UNDERSTAND THIS BECAUSE PEOPLE frickING SUCK.
Sorry for the caps lock. I feel like its the only way to get that point across
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:53 pm to Nguyening
Seahawks won because they had more 5 stars..
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:54 pm to hawgfaninc
Maybe if we add 12 unranked guys we can win a Super Bowl too
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:55 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
they're still good enough to make NFL rosters, play in the NFL, and many times out perform the higher ranked recruits
Its like I'm taking crazy pills.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 3:56 pm to hawgfaninc
Oh look, another thread trying to excuse Bielema's shitty recruiting.
Popular
Back to top


16









